These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30057702)

  • 1. Dental radiography image enhancement for treatment evaluation through digital image processing.
    Rahmi-Fajrin H; Puspita S; Riyadi S; Sofiani E
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Jul; 10(7):e629-e634. PubMed ID: 30057702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic Dental Radiography Image Enhancement Using Multiscale Mathematical Morphology.
    Román JCM; Fretes VR; Adorno CG; Silva RG; Noguera JLV; Legal-Ayala H; Mello-Román JD; Torres RDE; Facon J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33946991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of histogram equalization and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization effect on image quality and fractal dimensions of digital periapical radiographs.
    Mehdizadeh M; Tavakoli Tafti K; Soltani P
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):418-424. PubMed ID: 36076131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Mathematical Morphology-Based Filter for Noise Reduction and Detail Preservation in Low-Dose Dental CT Images.
    Stringhini RM; Welfer D; d'Ornellas MC; Gamarra DFT
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():253-257. PubMed ID: 31437924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization.
    Qiu J; Harold Li H; Zhang T; Ma F; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):218-223. PubMed ID: 28875594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cuckoo search algorithm based satellite image contrast and brightness enhancement using DWT-SVD.
    Bhandari AK; Soni V; Kumar A; Singh GK
    ISA Trans; 2014 Jul; 53(4):1286-96. PubMed ID: 24893835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dorsal Hand Vein Image Enhancement Using Fusion of CLAHE and Fuzzy Adaptive Gamma.
    Yakno M; Mohamad-Saleh J; Ibrahim MZ
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(19):. PubMed ID: 34640769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on construction of a medical x-ray direct digital radiography system and hybrid preprocessing methods.
    Ren Y; Wu S; Wang M; Cen Z
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():495729. PubMed ID: 25013452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-scale Morphological Image Enhancement of Chest Radiographs by a Hybrid Scheme.
    Alavijeh FS; Mahdavi-Nasab H
    J Med Signals Sens; 2015; 5(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25709942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital Mammograms with Image Enhancement Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review.
    Suradi SH; Abdullah KA
    Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(9):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 33504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A psychophysical comparison of two methods for adaptive histogram equalization.
    Zimmerman JB; Cousins SB; Hartzell KM; Frisse ME; Kahn MG
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 May; 2(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2488161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Preprocessing Techniques for Dental Image Analysis.
    Sukanya A; Krishnamurthy K; Balakrishnan T
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):776-780. PubMed ID: 33059551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography.
    Moradmand H; Setayeshi S; Karimian AR; Sirous M; Akbari ME
    Iran J Cancer Prev; 2012; 5(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25628822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using super-resolution generative adversarial network models and transfer learning to obtain high resolution digital periapical radiographs.
    Moran MBH; Faria MDB; Giraldi GA; Bastos LF; Conci A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Feb; 129():104139. PubMed ID: 33271400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An efficient wavelet and curvelet-based PET image denoising technique.
    Bal A; Banerjee M; Sharma P; Maitra M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Dec; 57(12):2567-2598. PubMed ID: 31654293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultra-low-dose CT image denoising using modified BM3D scheme tailored to data statistics.
    Zhao T; Hoffman J; McNitt-Gray M; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 30351450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.