These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30058222)

  • 1. A Regression Approach to Visual Predictive Checks for Population Pharmacometric Models.
    Jamsen KM; Patel K; Nieforth K; Kirkpatrick CMJ
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 7(10):678-686. PubMed ID: 30058222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Bergstrand M; Hooker AC; Wallin JE; Karlsson MO
    AAPS J; 2011 Jun; 13(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 21302010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic data binning for improved visual diagnosis of pharmacometric models.
    Lavielle M; Bleakley K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Dec; 38(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 22042498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of visual predictive checks accounting for multimodal parameter distributions in mixture models.
    Arshad U; Chasseloup E; Nordgren R; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2019 Jun; 46(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 30968312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverse probability of censoring weighting for visual predictive checks of time-to-event models with time-varying covariates.
    Bartels C; Dumortier T
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 33855777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative approach to the choice of number of samples for percentile estimation in bootstrap and visual predictive check analyses.
    Jonsson EN; Nyberg J
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 11(6):673-686. PubMed ID: 35353958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation.
    Wang DD; Zhang S
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Jan; 52(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 21257797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing quantile prediction with censored quantile regression models.
    Li R; Peng L
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):517-528. PubMed ID: 27931075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Covariate selection in pharmacometric analyses: a review of methods.
    Hutmacher MM; Kowalski KG
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Jan; 79(1):132-47. PubMed ID: 24962797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endothelial-like vascular progenitor cells (VPCs) from allogeneic and autologous donors: mobilization features distinct from hematopoietic progenitors.
    Allan DS; Dubé P; Roy J; Busque L; Roy DC
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2007 Apr; 13(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 17382249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison study of model evaluation methods: normalized prediction distribution errors vs. visual predictive check].
    Ren YP; Deng CH; Wang XP; Zhou TY; Lu W
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Sep; 46(9):1123-31. PubMed ID: 22121786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Predictive Check in Models with Time-Varying Input Function.
    Largajolli A; Bertoldo A; Campioni M; Cobelli C
    AAPS J; 2015 Nov; 17(6):1455-63. PubMed ID: 26265094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recent progress in analysis of arrhythmias using electrocardiography].
    Fujino T; Ishida S; Takahashi N; Nakagawa M; Ito M; Saikawa T
    Rinsho Byori; 1993 Apr; 41(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 7688834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability and uncertainty: interpretation and usage of pharmacometric simulations and intervals.
    Hu C
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2022 Oct; 49(5):487-491. PubMed ID: 35927373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in premature ventricular contractions].
    Takagi S; Iwase M; Jing HX; Aoki T; Yokota M; Hayashi H; Sotobata I
    J Cardiogr; 1986 Sep; 16(3):637-47. PubMed ID: 2443582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of ventricular premature complexes in asymptomatic patients ≤21 years as predictors of poor left ventricular function.
    Guerrier K; Anderson JB; Czosek RJ; Mays WA; Statile C; Knilans TK; Spar DS
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 115(5):652-5. PubMed ID: 25586334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. V
    Lommerse J; Plock N; Cheung SYA; Sachs JR
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2021 Sep; 10(9):1092-1106. PubMed ID: 34242494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phxnlme: An R package that facilitates pharmacometric workflow of Phoenix NLME analyses.
    Lim CN; Liang S; Feng K; Chittenden J; Henry A; Mouksassi S; Birnbaum AK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Mar; 140():121-129. PubMed ID: 28254068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A censored quantile regression approach for the analysis of time to event data.
    Xue X; Xie X; Strickler HD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):955-965. PubMed ID: 27166408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.