These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30058947)
1. In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication. Chinn S; Lane DS; Hart PS Public Underst Sci; 2018 Oct; 27(7):807-823. PubMed ID: 30058947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility. Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis. van Stekelenburg A; Schaap G; Veling H; van 't Riet J; Buijzen M Psychol Sci; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1989-2008. PubMed ID: 36242521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia. Buys L; Aird R; van Megen K; Miller E; Sommerfeld J Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 23825246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation. Lewandowsky S; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK; Oreskes N; Risbey JS Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():124-139. PubMed ID: 30686473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety. Kerr JR; Wilson MS PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200295. PubMed ID: 29979762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science. Kohl PA; Kim SY; Peng Y; Akin H; Koh EJ; Howell A; Dunwoody S Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):976-991. PubMed ID: 26657318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Goldberg MH; van der Linden S; Maibach E; Leiserowitz A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(30):14804-14805. PubMed ID: 31285333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communicating expert consensus increases personal support for COVID-19 mitigation policies. Kerr JR; van der Linden S J Appl Soc Psychol; 2022 Jan; 52(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 34511636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Većkalov B; Geiger SJ; Bartoš F; White MP; Rutjens BT; van Harreveld F; Stablum F; Akın B; Aldoh A; Bai J; Berglund F; Bratina Zimic A; Broyles M; Catania A; Chen A; Chorzępa M; Farahat E; Götz J; Hoter-Ishay B; Jordan G; Joustra S; Klingebiel J; Krajnc Ž; Krug A; Andersen TL; Löloff J; Natarajan D; Newman-Oktan S; Niehoff E; Paerels C; Papirmeister R; Peregrina S; Pohl F; Remsö A; Roh A; Rusyidi B; Schmidt J; Shavgulidze M; Vellinho Nardin V; Wang R; Warner K; Wattier M; Wong CY; Younssi M; Ruggeri K; van der Linden S Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Oct; 8(10):1892-1905. PubMed ID: 39187712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Fiske ST; Dupree C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies. Myers TA; Kotcher J; Stenhouse N; Anderson AA; Maibach E; Beall L; Leiserowitz A Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):843-860. PubMed ID: 26960910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers. van der Bles AM; van der Linden S; Freeman ALJ; Spiegelhalter DJ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Apr; 117(14):7672-7683. PubMed ID: 32205438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trust/distrust judgments and perceptions of climate science: A research note on skeptics' rationalizations. Sarathchandra D; Haltinner K Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 31691642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public perception and communication of scientific uncertainty. Broomell SB; Kane PB J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Feb; 146(2):286-304. PubMed ID: 28134548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public Reception of Climate Science: Coherence, Reliability, and Independence. Hahn U; Harris AJ; Corner A Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):180-95. PubMed ID: 26705767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Drummond C; Fischhoff B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):9587-9592. PubMed ID: 28827344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Bertoldo R; Mays C; Böhm G; Poortinga W; Poumadère M; Tvinnereim E; Arnold A; Steentjes K; Pidgeon N Public Underst Sci; 2019 Oct; 28(7):778-796. PubMed ID: 31359837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethics and the Framing of Climate Change's Health Risks. Valles SA Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 25186465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: the results of two experiments. Myers TA; Maibach E; Peters E; Leiserowitz A PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120985. PubMed ID: 25812121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]