176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30059239)
1. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
Suh Y; Ferris TK
Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.
Large DR; Burnett G; Crundall E; Lawson G; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():184-196. PubMed ID: 31046950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
Zhang F; Roberts SC
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction.
Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 36178277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distraction-induced driving error: an on-road examination of the errors made by distracted and undistracted drivers.
Young KL; Salmon PM; Cornelissen M
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():218-25. PubMed ID: 22727884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supporting anticipation in driving through attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays.
Stahl P; Donmez B; Jamieson GA
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jun; 91():103-13. PubMed ID: 26974027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.
Ban G; Park W
Hum Factors; 2024 Jan; ():187208241226838. PubMed ID: 38240077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems.
Mehler B; Kidd D; Reimer B; Reagan I; Dobres J; McCartt A
Ergonomics; 2016 Mar; 59(3):344-67. PubMed ID: 26269281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naturalistic distraction and driving safety in older drivers.
Aksan N; Dawson JD; Emerson JL; Yu L; Uc EY; Anderson SW; Rizzo M
Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):841-53. PubMed ID: 23964422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions.
Ebel P; Lingenfelder C; Vogelsang A
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106956. PubMed ID: 36681017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
Larsson P; Niemand M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
