These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30059239)

  • 21. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.
    Harbluk JL; Noy YI; Trbovich PL; Eizenman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 17054894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of touchscreen versus keyboard/mouse interaction for large screen process control displays.
    Noah B; Li J; Rothrock L
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Oct; 64():1-13. PubMed ID: 28610809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating the impact of static roadside advertising on drivers' situation awareness.
    Young KL; Stephens AN; Logan DB; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():136-145. PubMed ID: 28166872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A spectral power analysis of driving behavior changes during the transition from nondistraction to distraction.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 28534644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction.
    Ranney TA; Harbluk JL; Noy YI
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 16170949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Reagan I; Kidd D; Dobres J
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1565-1585. PubMed ID: 27110964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
    Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mid-Air Tactile Feedback Co-Located With Virtual Touchscreen Improves Dual-Task Performance.
    Korres G; Chehabeddine S; Eid M
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(4):825-830. PubMed ID: 32054586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 17702223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
    Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use in specific driving contexts.
    Fitch GM; Hanowski RJ; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 24896192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of different speech and touch interfaces to in-vehicle music retrieval systems.
    Garay-Vega L; Pradhan AK; Weinberg G; Schmidt-Nielsen B; Harsham B; Shen Y; Divekar G; Romoser M; Knodler M; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):913-20. PubMed ID: 20380920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Craig CM; Tian D; Morris NL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1786-1797. PubMed ID: 37127401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.