325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30059686)
21. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting?
Telli O; Hamidi N; Bagci U; Demirbas A; Hascicek AM; Soygur T; Burgu B
Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 May; 32(5):853-857. PubMed ID: 28070668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stone clustering of patients with cystine urinary stone formation.
Purohit RS; Stoller ML
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):630-4; discussion 634-5. PubMed ID: 15072865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureterolithiasis in patients with cystinuria.
Katz G; Kovalski N; Landau EH
Br J Urol; 1993 Jul; 72(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 8149169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies.
Hertzig LL; Iwaszko MR; Rangel LJ; Patterson DE; Gettman MT; Krambeck AE
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2152-7. PubMed ID: 23228383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term followup in patients with cystine urinary calculi treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy.
Knoll LD; Segura JW; Patterson DE; Leroy AJ; Smith LH
J Urol; 1988 Aug; 140(2):246-8. PubMed ID: 3398116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of new technology in the treatment of cystine stones.
Trinchieri A; Montanari E; Zanetti G; Lizzano R
Urol Res; 2007 Jun; 35(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 17440715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retrograde renoscopic fragmentation of moderate-size (1.5-3.0-cm) renal cystine stones.
Rudnick DM; Bennett PM; Dretler SP
J Endourol; 1999 Sep; 13(7):483-5. PubMed ID: 10569520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment of cystine urolithiasis by a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis.
Ahlstrand C; Tiselius HG
J Stone Dis; 1993 Jan; 5(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 10148259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Yuruk E; Tefekli A; Sari E; Karadag MA; Tepeler A; Binbay M; Muslumanoglu AY
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 19091339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Renal stone composition does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.
Kaygısız O; Türegün FA; Satar N; Özen E; Toksöz S; Doğan HS; Pişkin MM; İzol V; Sarıkaya Ş; Kılıçarslan H; Çiçek T; Öztürk A; Tekgül S; Önal B
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1863-1869. PubMed ID: 29761226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cystine urolithiasis in Finland.
Ala-Opas M
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1989; 78(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 2802494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of residual stones after ureterolithotripsy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective study.
Huang Z; Zhao X; Zhang L; Zhong Z; Xu R; Zhang L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67046. PubMed ID: 23785516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor.
Landau EH; Shenfeld OZ; Pode D; Shapiro A; Meretyk S; Katz G; Katz R; Duvdevani M; Hardak B; Cipele H; Hidas G; Yutkin V; Gofrit ON
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4 Suppl):1835-9. PubMed ID: 19692011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictors for kidney stones recurrence following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Chongruksut W; Lojanapiwat B; Tawichasri C; Paichitvichean S; Euathrongchit J; Ayudhya VC; Patumanond J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 22550832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cystine stones: the impact of new treatment.
Martin X; Salas M; Labeeuw M; Pozet N; Gelet A; Dubernard JM
Br J Urol; 1991 Sep; 68(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 1913062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cystine stones: a single tertiary center experience.
Sfoungaristos S; Hakim R; Katz R; Gofrit ON; Landau EH; Yutkin V; Pode D; Duvdevani M
J Endourol; 2015 Mar; 29(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 25133928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi.
Mays N; Challah S; Patel S; Palfrey E; Creeser R; Vadera P; Burney P
BMJ; 1988 Jul; 297(6643):253-8. PubMed ID: 3416143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
