These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30059969)
1. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study. Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis. Lee S; Yu HJ; Lim S; Park H; Kwon MJ; Woo HY Int J Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 80():98-104. PubMed ID: 30634041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for syphilis with dual algorithms: analysis of discordant and concordant serology results in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. Zhuang YH; Liu H; Tang J; Wang YZ; Zheng XH; Gong Y; Xu XF; Gao X; Lu RQ; Ju SG; Guo L J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):178-184. PubMed ID: 30223307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods. Simčič S; Potočnik M Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2015; 24(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 26086162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consistency Between Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay and Architect Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay and Characterization of Inconsistent Samples. Zhiyan L; Meiling W; Ping L; Jinhua D; Zhenlin Y; Zhenru F J Clin Lab Anal; 2015 Jul; 29(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 24840601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio. Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis]. Zarakolu P Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories. Hamill MM; Mbazira KJ; Kiragga AN; Gaydos CA; Jett-Goheen M; Parkes-Ratanshi R; Manabe YC; Nakku-Joloba E; Rompalo A Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):829-833. PubMed ID: 29944643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing. Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tradition algorithm approach underestimates the prevalence of serodiagnosis of syphilis in HIV-infected individuals. Chen B; Peng X; Xie T; Jin C; Liu F; Wu N PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2017 Jul; 11(7):e0005758. PubMed ID: 28727773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization. Li Z; Feng Z; Liu P; Yan C Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Sep; 53(Pt 5):588-92. PubMed ID: 26680646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Syphilis Immunoassay Signal Strength Correlates with Active Infection in Pregnant Women. Zofkie AC; Seasely AR; Gaffney D; Rogers VL; Mcintire DD; Roberts SW; Adhikari EH Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):671-678. PubMed ID: 31910464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening]. Ozbek OA; Doğan Y Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved efficiency using sequential automated immunoassays for syphilis screening in blood donors. Cheng A; Das A; Styles CE; Naing Z; Rawlinson WD; Gosbell IB J Clin Microbiol; 2024 Aug; 62(8):e0047624. PubMed ID: 39007562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between DiaSorin Liaison Treponema pallidum antibody indices and confirmatory assay results in the reverse syphilis testing algorithm. Prince HE; Marlowe EM; Schwab DA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 May; 100(1):115303. PubMed ID: 33503569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a Multiplex Fully Automated Treponemal and Nontreponemal (Rapid Plasma Reagin) Assay. Arbefeville S; Lynch M; Ferrieri P Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jul; 152(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31139835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abbott ARCHITECT Syphilis TP Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Accurately Diagnoses Past or Current Syphilis in Pregnancy. Adhikari EH; Frame IJ; Hill E; Fatabhoy R; Strickland AL; Cavuoti D; McIntire DD; Hollaway RM Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jan; 37(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31905408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limited Utility of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Testing in HIV Clinic Among Men Who Have Sex With Men. Dionne-Odom J; Van Der Pol B; Boutwell A; Biligowda N; Schmid DG; Hook EW Sex Transm Dis; 2021 Sep; 48(9):675-679. PubMed ID: 33534407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]