140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30060855)
1. Association of Anticipated Insertional Pain With Intrauterine Device Initiation.
Narayan A; Sheeder J; Guiahi M
J Adolesc Health; 2018 Jul; 63(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 30060855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence and predictors of initiation of intrauterine devices and subdermal implants immediately after surgical abortion.
Roe AH; Fortin J; Janiak E; Maurer R; Goldberg AB
Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 31082394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ease of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in family planning settings.
Harvey C; Bateson D; Wattimena J; Black KI
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Dec; 52(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 23106201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.
Luchowski AT; Anderson BL; Power ML; Raglan GB; Espey E; Schulkin J
Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 24656553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Suvisaari J; Lähteenmäki P
Contraception; 1996 Oct; 54(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 8922872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
