These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30062789)

  • 1. When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
    Jackson D; White IR
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1040-1058. PubMed ID: 30062789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?".
    Schlattmann P
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1089-1090. PubMed ID: 30088289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A random effects meta-analysis model with Box-Cox transformation.
    Yamaguchi Y; Maruo K; Partlett C; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):109. PubMed ID: 28724350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Normality Assumption in Meta-Analyses.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 189(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 31781756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression.
    van Houwelingen HC; Arends LR; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(4):589-624. PubMed ID: 11836738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?" Meta-analysis and normality assumptions in statistical bioinformatics.
    Jung K
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1064-1065. PubMed ID: 30079529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Citation of previous meta-analyses on the same topic: a clue to perpetuation of incorrect methods?
    Li T; Dickersin K
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1113-9. PubMed ID: 23522971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced Statistics for Exotic Animal Practitioners.
    Hodsoll J; Hellier JM; Ryan EG
    Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(3):961-972. PubMed ID: 28781044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Author's response: When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?
    Jackson D; White IR
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1094-1095. PubMed ID: 30209813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of Gaussian individual patient data: Two-stage or not two-stage?
    Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Kenward MG; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1419-1438. PubMed ID: 29349792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis.
    Cates CJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2002; 2():1. PubMed ID: 11860604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution to the discussion of "When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?" A Bayesian perspective.
    Röver C; Friede T
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1068-1070. PubMed ID: 30069981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible parametric models for random-effects distributions.
    Lee KJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 17477434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random-effects meta-analysis for systematic reviews of phase I clinical trials: Rare events and missing data.
    Kim MO; Wang X; Liu C; Dorris K; Fouladi M; Song S
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):124-135. PubMed ID: 27285532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis, Simpson's paradox, and the number needed to treat.
    Altman DG; Deeks JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2002; 2():3. PubMed ID: 11860606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A recursive partitioning approach for subgroup identification in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Mistry D; Stallard N; Underwood M
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29383818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):841-56. PubMed ID: 9595615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.