102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30062934)
1. The validity of the Mirels score for predicting impending pathological fractures of the lower limb.
Howard EL; Shepherd KL; Cribb G; Cool P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1100-1105. PubMed ID: 30062934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mirels' score for upper limb metastatic lesions: do we need a different cutoff for recommending prophylactic fixation?
Hoban KA; Downie S; Adamson DJA; MacLean JG; Cool P; Jariwala AC
JSES Int; 2022 Jul; 6(4):675-681. PubMed ID: 35813136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-observer variation in classification systems for impending fractures of bone metastases.
El-Husseiny M; Coleman N
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 19949789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a Novel Scoring System Improve on the Mirels Score in Predicting the Fracture Risk in Patients with Multiple Myeloma?
Toci GR; Bressner JA; Morris CD; Fayad L; Levin AS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Mar; 479(3):521-530. PubMed ID: 32420721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting Pathological Fractures at Metastatic Humeral Lesions.
Tat J; Bodansky D; Sheth U; Ung Y; Whyne C; Nam D
JB JS Open Access; 2023; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 37123507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High rate of fracture in long-bone metastasis: Proposal for an improved Mirels predictive score.
Crenn V; Carlier C; Gouin F; Sailhan F; Bonnevialle P;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 106(6):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 32782175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mirels' rating for humerus lesions is both reproducible and valid.
Evans AR; Bottros J; Grant W; Chen BY; Damron TA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Jun; 466(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18357496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intra-observer variability associated with the use of the Mirels' scoring system for metastatic bone lesions.
Mac Niocaill RF; Quinlan JF; Stapleton RD; Hurson B; Dudeney S; O'Toole GC
Int Orthop; 2011 Jan; 35(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 20084378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical evaluation of Mirels' rating system for impending pathologic fractures.
Damron TA; Morgan H; Prakash D; Grant W; Aronowitz J; Heiner J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Oct; (415 Suppl):S201-7. PubMed ID: 14600611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemotherapy May Obviate Prophylactic Femoral Nail Surgery for Multiple Myeloma Patients With High Mirels' Score Lesions and Impending Pathological Hip Fracture.
Divekar O; Ajayi B; Barkham B; Bernard J; Bishop T; Reyal Y; Willis F; Boyd K; Lui D; Coomber R
Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37670. PubMed ID: 37206489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond Mirels: Factors Influencing Surgical Outcome of Metastasis to the Extremities in the Modern Era.
Scott E; Klement MR; Brigman BE; Eward WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2018; 27(3):178-186. PubMed ID: 30489242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mirels Scores in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Stabilization for Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.
Ramsey DC; Lam PW; Hayden J; Doung YC; Gundle KR
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2020 Sep; 4(9):e20.00141. PubMed ID: 32890013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is Prophylactic Intervention More Cost-effective Than the Treatment of Pathologic Fractures in Metastatic Bone Disease?
Blank AT; Lerman DM; Patel NM; Rapp TB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1563-70. PubMed ID: 27020430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the risk factors for impending fractures following radiotherapy for long bone metastases using CT scan-based virtual simulation: a retrospective study.
Tatar Z; Soubrier M; Dillies AF; Verrelle P; Boisgard S; Lapeyre M
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 9():227. PubMed ID: 25319635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interobserver reliability comparison between the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's open fracture classification and the Gustilo and Anderson classification.
Ghoshal A; Enninghorst N; Sisak K; Balogh ZJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Feb; 100-B(2):242-246. PubMed ID: 29437068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulating activities of daily living with finite element analysis improves fracture prediction for patients with metastatic femoral lesions.
Goodheart JR; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1226-34. PubMed ID: 25761000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
