These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30063949)

  • 1. A quantitative risk assessment for skin sensitizing plant protection products: Linking derived No-Effect levels (DNELs) with agricultural exposure models.
    Sanvido O; Schmid K; FitzGerald RE; Roth N; Wilks MF; Bormann P; Hopf NB
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Oct; 98():171-183. PubMed ID: 30063949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preservatives and skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment.
    Basketter DA; Clapp CJ; Safford BJ; Jowsey IR; McNamee P; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18346392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures.
    Farage MA; Bjerke DL; Mahony C; Blackburn KL; Gerberick GF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 14678210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the risk of induction of skin sensitization to plant protection products: A quantitative approach.
    Corea N; Corvaro M; Kluxen FM; Grivel A; Morgan N; Wiemann C; Basketter D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jun; 141():105408. PubMed ID: 37207870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive surveillance of contact allergies: an important component of the risk management strategy for skin sensitizers.
    Jowsey IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 17577370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase.
    Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: skin sensitization and quantitative risk assessment.
    Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 29(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 19883218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients.
    Api AM; Basketter DA; Cadby PA; Cano MF; Ellis G; Gerberick GF; Griem P; McNamee PM; Ryan CA; Safford R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 18406028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptable surface limits (ASLs) of skin sensitizers derived from the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values and their relationships to known sensitization potency information.
    Fukushima A; Hayashi T; Takeyoshi M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):1723-1730. PubMed ID: 35580980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments.
    Troutman JA; Foertsch LM; Kern PS; Dai HJ; Quijano M; Dobson RL; Lalko JF; Lepoittevin JP; Gerberick GF
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Aug; 122(2):422-36. PubMed ID: 21555337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro human skin test for assessing sensitization potential.
    Ahmed SS; Wang XN; Fielding M; Kerry A; Dickinson I; Munuswamy R; Kimber I; Dickinson AM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 May; 36(5):669-84. PubMed ID: 26251951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of guinea pig data to obtain starting points for skin sensitisation risk assessment - A commentary.
    Basketter D; Corea N; Corvaro M; Grivel A; Kluxen FM; Morgan N; Wiemann C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Mar; 148():105584. PubMed ID: 38417477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Felter SP; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Gilmour NJ; Gerberick GF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Feb; 37(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12662904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of KeratinoSens
    Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Otsubo Y; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 30626776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for occupational exposure of hairdressers to hair dye ingredients.
    Goebel C; Diepgen TL; Blömeke B; Gaspari AA; Schnuch A; Fuchs A; Schlotmann K; Krasteva M; Kimber I
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 95():124-132. PubMed ID: 29530615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic derivation of the interspecies assessment factor for skin sensitization.
    Bil W; Schuur AG; Ezendam J; Bokkers BGH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():34-44. PubMed ID: 28545776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of pre- and pro-haptens with a β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system for skin sensitization.
    Nepal MR; Kang MJ; Kim GH; Cha DH; Nam DH; Jeong TC
    Toxicol Lett; 2019 May; 305():81-93. PubMed ID: 30711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of the dermal sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients.
    Api AM; Vey M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 18635300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principles for identification of High Potency Category Chemicals for which the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach should not be applied.
    Roberts DW; Api AM; Safford RJ; Lalko JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 72(3):683-93. PubMed ID: 25765509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.