222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30064937)
1. Accuracy of predicted orthogonal projection angles for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Steinvil A; Weissman G; Ertel AW; Weigold G; Rogers T; Koifman E; Buchanan KD; Shults C; Torguson R; Okubagzi PG; Satler LF; Ben-Dor I; Waksman R
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 30064937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography.
Kurra V; Kapadia SR; Tuzcu EM; Halliburton SS; Svensson L; Roselli EE; Schoenhagen P
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 3(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 20129578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic Estimation of Optimal Deployment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Computed Tomography.
Kerner A; Abadi S; Dotan R; Javitt M; Aronson D; Lessick J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar; 26(2):130-138. PubMed ID: 28820541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography.
Binder RK; Leipsic J; Wood D; Moore T; Toggweiler S; Willson A; Gurvitch R; Freeman M; Webb JG
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 22438432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and Inter-Observer Reproducibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning Measurements by Multidetector Computed Tomography.
Heo R; Hartaighl B; Cho I; Valenti V; Leipsic J; Wong SC; Salemi A; Minutello RM; Bergman G; Min JK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 26897834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography (CT) assessment of the membranous septal anatomy prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve.
Oestreich BA; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Nijjar PS; Adabag S; Bertog S; Kelly R; Garcia S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(5 Pt B):626-631. PubMed ID: 29352699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of acute recoil after valve deployment and after post-dilation in patients undergoing transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN-3 valve.
Sammour Y; Kadri AN; Gajulapalli RD; Kaur M; Bazarbashi N; Banerjee K; Karrthik A; Dhaliwal K; Burns D; Yun J; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):1522-1530. PubMed ID: 32427426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Sizing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rong LQ; Hameed I; Salemi A; Rahouma M; Khan FM; Wijeysundera HC; Angiolillo DJ; Shore-Lesserson L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Girardi LN; Fremes SE; Gaudino M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Oct; 8(19):e013463. PubMed ID: 31549579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR.
Samim M; Stella PR; Agostoni P; Kluin J; Ramjankhan F; Budde RP; Sieswerda G; Algeri E; van Belle C; Elkalioubie A; Juthier F; Belkacemi A; Bertrand ME; Doevendans PA; Van Belle E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23489538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of short roll C-arm computed tomography and fully automated 3D analysis tools to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Kim MS; Bracken J; Eshuis P; Chen SY; Fullerton D; Cleveland J; Messenger JC; Carroll JD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1145-52. PubMed ID: 27091735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MDCT planning of trans catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): determination of optimal c-arm angulation.
Mehier B; Dubourg B; Eltchaninoff H; Durand E; Tron C; Cribier A; Michelin P; Dacher JN
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1551-1557. PubMed ID: 32306158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between implantation depth assessed by computed tomography and new-onset conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Almeida JG; Ferreira SM; Fonseca P; Dias T; Guerreiro C; Barbosa AR; Teixeira P; Carvalho M; Ferreira W; Ferreira ND; Oliveira M; Gonçalves H; Braga P; Ribeiro J; Primo J; Ribeiro VG
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):332-337. PubMed ID: 28844528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of aortic valve annular plane assessment by on-table three-dimensional rotational angiography and preprocedural computed tomography.
Tanner R; Murphy S; Malone C; McGorrian C; Sugrue D; Barton D; Byrne R; Blake G; Margey R; Casserly IP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 100(7):1316-1322. PubMed ID: 36403283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Value of venous phase imaging for detection and interpretation of findings with impact on the TAVR procedure.
Roller FC; Schuhbaeck A; Achenbach S; Krombach GA; Schneider C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 25939252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for Paravalvular Regurgitation After TAVR With the Self-Expanding Prosthesis: Quantitative Measurement of MDCT Analysis.
Yoon SH; Ahn JM; Ohno Y; Barbanti M; Chan J; Lin MS; Kim YH; Yang DH; Sugiyama D; Chan KT; Immé S; Tamburino CI; Sgroi C; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Lee M; Kao HL; Tamburino C; Park SJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1233-1234. PubMed ID: 26777220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Maia J; Ladeiras-Lopes R; Guerreiro C; Carvalho M; Fontes-Carvalho R; Braga P; Sampaio F
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):291-298. PubMed ID: 31659601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional printing of an aortic model for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: possible clinical applications.
Hernández-Enríquez M; Brugaletta S; Andreu D; Macià-Muñoz G; Castrejón-Subirá M; Fernández-Suelves S; Hernández-Obiols M; Dantas AP; Freixa X; Martin-Yuste V; Camara O; Sabaté M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):283-285. PubMed ID: 27757564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Double S-Curve Versus Cusp-Overlap Technique: Defining the Optimal Fluoroscopic Projection for TAVR With a Self-Expanding Device.
Ben-Shoshan J; Alosaimi H; Lauzier PT; Pighi M; Talmor-Barkan Y; Overtchouk P; Martucci G; Spaziano M; Finkelstein A; Gada H; Piazza N
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 33478635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of left-sided heart structures in patients with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation based on multislice computed tomography.
Spaziano M; Thériault-Lauzier P; Meti N; Vaquerizo B; Blanke P; Deli-Hussein J; Chetrit M; Galatos C; Buithieu J; Lange R; Martucci G; Leipsic J; Piazza N
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 26732861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Prognosis, Imaging Predictors, and Potential Management.
Cortés C; Amat-Santos IJ; Nombela-Franco L; Muñoz-Garcia AJ; Gutiérrez-Ibanes E; De La Torre Hernandez JM; Córdoba-Soriano JG; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Hernández-García JM; Gonzalez-Mansilla A; Ruano J; Jimenez-Mazuecos J; Castrodeza J; Tobar J; Islas F; Revilla A; Puri R; Puerto A; Gómez I; Rodés-Cabau J; San Román JA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(15):1603-14. PubMed ID: 27491611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
