294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30065322)
1. CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union.
Callaway E
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7716):16. PubMed ID: 30065322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Separate product from process: framing the debate that surrounds the potential uptake of new breeding technologies.
Parry G; Jose S
Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29220093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crop conundrum.
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):307-8. PubMed ID: 26672517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revamp of UK CRISPR regulation will require public trust.
Nature; 2021 Mar; 591(7850):345. PubMed ID: 33727726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Strict EU ruling on gene-edited crops squeezes science.
Wight AJ
Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):15-16. PubMed ID: 30377319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. CRISPR conundrum: Strict European court ruling leaves food-testing labs without a plan.
Ledford H
Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):15. PubMed ID: 31363192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Waive CRISPR patents to meet food needs in low-income countries.
van der Oost J; Fresco LO
Nature; 2021 Sep; 597(7875):178. PubMed ID: 34489579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Russia joins in global gene-editing bonanza.
Dobrovidova O
Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):319-320. PubMed ID: 31089233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?
Jorasch P
Plant Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 39(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 31754780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
Whelan AI; Lema MA
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene-edited plants: What is happening now?
Jansson S
Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):370-371. PubMed ID: 30461029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations.
Ledford H
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):158-9. PubMed ID: 27075074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gene editing in legal limbo in Europe.
Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7642):392. PubMed ID: 28230148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scandinavian perspectives on plant gene technology: applications, policies and progress.
Eriksson D; Brinch-Pedersen H; Chawade A; Holme IB; Hvoslef-Eide TAK; Ritala A; Teeri TH; Thorstensen T
Physiol Plant; 2018 Feb; 162(2):219-238. PubMed ID: 29080293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breeding controls.
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):147. PubMed ID: 27075058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions.
Eriksson D; Custers R; Edvardsson Björnberg K; Hansson SO; Purnhagen K; Qaim M; Romeis J; Schiemann J; Schleissing S; Tosun J; Visser RGF
Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-234. PubMed ID: 32059122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
Georges F; Ray H
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EU proposal on CRISPR-edited crops is welcome - but not enough.
Mehta D
Nature; 2023 Jul; 619(7970):437. PubMed ID: 37464084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
Smyth SJ
GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27858499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How should the applications of genome editing be assessed and regulated?
Fears R; Ter Meulen V
Elife; 2017 Apr; 6():. PubMed ID: 28375079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
