161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30066446)
1. Performance of SAPS II according to ICU length of stay: Protocol for an observational study.
Granholm A; Christiansen CF; Christensen S; Perner A; Møller MH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Jan; 63(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 30066446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of SAPS II according to ICU length of stay: A Danish nationwide cohort study.
Granholm A; Christiansen CF; Christensen S; Perner A; Møller MH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Oct; 63(9):1200-1209. PubMed ID: 31197823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the SAPS II score valid in surgical intensive care unit patients?
Sakr Y; Marques J; Mortsch S; Gonsalves MD; Hekmat K; Kabisch B; Kohl M; Reinhart K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 20860597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study.
Granholm A; Møller MH; Krag M; Perner A; Hjortrup PB
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168948. PubMed ID: 28006826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of length of stay in the ICU on power of discrimination of a multipurpose severity score (SAPS). ARCHIDIA.
Sicignano A; Carozzi C; Giudici D; Merli G; Arlati S; Pulici M
Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1048-51. PubMed ID: 8923068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intensive care unit performance in Lithuania using the SAPS II system.
Vosylius S; Sipylaite J; Ivaskevicius J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2004 Aug; 21(8):619-24. PubMed ID: 15473616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.
Arabi Y; Al Shirawi N; Memish Z; Venkatesh S; Al-Shimemeri A
Crit Care; 2003 Oct; 7(5):R116-22. PubMed ID: 12974979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.
Lee JH; Hwang SY; Kim HR; Kim YW; Kang MJ; Cho KW; Lee DW; Kim YH
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2017 May; 36(5):431-437. PubMed ID: 27387349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predict models for prolonged ICU stay using APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores: A Japanese multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Takekawa D; Endo H; Hashiba E; Hirota K
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269737. PubMed ID: 35709080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale.
Zhao XX; Su YY; Wang M; Zhang Y; Ye H; Feng HH; Zhang YZ; Gao DQ; Chen WB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1132-7. PubMed ID: 23506592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU).
Granholm A; Perner A; Krag M; Marker S; Hjortrup PB; Haase N; Holst LB; Collet MO; Jensen AKG; Møller MH
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Oct; 63(9):1216-1224. PubMed ID: 31273763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mortality probability model III and simplified acute physiology score II: assessing their value in predicting length of stay and comparison to APACHE IV.
Vasilevskis EE; Kuzniewicz MW; Cason BA; Lane RK; Dean ML; Clay T; Rennie DJ; Vittinghoff E; Dudley RA
Chest; 2009 Jul; 136(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 19363210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population.
Capuzzo M; Valpondi V; Sgarbi A; Bortolazzi S; Pavoni V; Gilli G; Candini G; Gritti G; Alvisi R
Intensive Care Med; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1779-85. PubMed ID: 11271085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical care in the emergency department: A physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation.
Nguyen HB; Rivers EP; Havstad S; Knoblich B; Ressler JA; Muzzin AM; Tomlanovich MC
Acad Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1354-61. PubMed ID: 11099425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of the calibration of SAPS II and SAPS 3 mortality scores in intensive care: a European multicenter study.
Poncet A; Perneger TV; Merlani P; Capuzzo M; Combescure C
Crit Care; 2017 Apr; 21(1):85. PubMed ID: 28376908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II for Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients in Intensive Care Unit.
Xu F; Li W; Zhang C; Cao R
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():774935. PubMed ID: 34938790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.
Castella X; Artigas A; Bion J; Kari A
Crit Care Med; 1995 Aug; 23(8):1327-35. PubMed ID: 7634802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system.
Desa K; Sustić A; Zupan Z; Krstulović B; Golubović V
Croat Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):964-9. PubMed ID: 16342351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study.
Moreno R; Morais P
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Feb; 23(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 9069003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Case-mix-adjusted length of stay and mortality in 23 Finnish ICUs.
Niskanen M; Reinikainen M; Pettilä V
Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1060-7. PubMed ID: 19125233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
