BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30066454)

  • 1. Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial.
    Hyldig N; Vinter CA; Kruse M; Mogensen O; Bille C; Sorensen JA; Lamont RF; Wu C; Heidemann LN; Ibsen MH; Laursen JB; Ovesen PG; Rorbye C; Tanvig M; Joergensen JS
    BJOG; 2019 Apr; 126(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 30066454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial-based economic evaluation.
    Hyldig N; Joergensen JS; Wu C; Bille C; Vinter CA; Sorensen JA; Mogensen O; Lamont RF; Möller S; Kruse M
    BJOG; 2019 Apr; 126(5):619-627. PubMed ID: 30507022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in obese women undergoing caesarean section: multicentre parallel group randomised controlled trial.
    Gillespie BM; Webster J; Ellwood D; Thalib L; Whitty JA; Mahomed K; Clifton V; Kumar S; Wagner A; Kang E; Chaboyer W
    BMJ; 2021 May; 373():n893. PubMed ID: 33952438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative-pressure wound therapy compared with standard dressings following surgical treatment of major trauma to the lower limb: the WHiST RCT.
    Costa ML; Achten J; Knight R; Png ME; Bruce J; Dutton S; Madan J; Vadher K; Dritsaki M; Masters J; Spoors L; Campolier M; Parsons N; Fernandez M; Jones S; Grant R; Nanchahal J
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Aug; 24(38):1-86. PubMed ID: 32821038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy in preventing surgical site infection among obese women giving birth by caesarean section: An economic evaluation (DRESSING trial).
    Whitty JA; Wagner AP; Kang E; Ellwood D; Chaboyer W; Kumar S; Clifton VL; Thalib L; Gillespie BM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Oct; 63(5):673-680. PubMed ID: 37200473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Tuuli MG; Liu J; Tita ATN; Longo S; Trudell A; Carter EB; Shanks A; Woolfolk C; Caughey AB; Warren DK; Odibo AO; Colditz G; Macones GA; Harper L
    JAMA; 2020 Sep; 324(12):1180-1189. PubMed ID: 32960242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study.
    Mark KS; Alger L; Terplan M
    Surg Innov; 2014 Aug; 21(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 24056202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical wound complications in the cesarean section at-risk population: a parallel group randomised multicentre trial-the CYGNUS protocol.
    Sandy-Hodgetts K; Parsons R; Norman R; Fear MW; Wood FM; White SW
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e035727. PubMed ID: 33077559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ADding negative pRESSure to improve healING (the DRESSING trial): a RCT protocol.
    Gillespie BM; Webster J; Ellwood D; Stapleton H; Whitty JA; Thalib L; Cullum N; Mahomed K; Chaboyer W
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010287. PubMed ID: 26832435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on wound complications in obese women after caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gillespie BM; Thalib L; Ellwood D; Kang E; Mahomed K; Kumar S; Chaboyer W
    BJOG; 2022 Jan; 129(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 34622545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Morbidly Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hussamy DJ; Wortman AC; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ; Casey BM; Roberts SW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 31503147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection in obese women undergoing cesarean section: an evidence synthesis with trial sequential analysis.
    Huang HP; Zhao WJ; Pu J; He F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Aug; 34(15):2498-2505. PubMed ID: 31530067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review with meta-analysis on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing for obese women after caesarean section.
    Tian Y; Li K; Zeng L
    Nurs Open; 2023 Sep; 10(9):5999-6013. PubMed ID: 37365685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Wound Complication After Cesarean Delivery in Women With Class II or III Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Wihbey KA; Joyce EM; Spalding ZT; Jones HJ; MacKenzie TA; Evans RH; Fung JL; Goldman MB; Erekson E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 132(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 29995726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.
    Reeves BC; Rooshenas L; Macefield RC; Woodward M; Welton NJ; Waterhouse BR; Torrance AD; Strong S; Siassakos D; Seligman W; Rogers CA; Rickard L; Pullyblank A; Pope C; Pinkney TD; Pathak S; Owais A; O'Callaghan J; O'Brien S; Nepogodiev D; Nadi K; Murkin CE; Munder T; Milne T; Messenger D; McMullan CM; Mathers JM; Mason M; Marshall M; Lovegrove R; Longman RJ; Lloyd J; Lim J; Lee K; Korwar V; Hughes D; Hill G; Harris R; Hamdan M; Brown HG; Gooberman-Hill R; Glasbey J; Fryer C; Ellis L; Elliott D; Dumville JC; Draycott T; Donovan JL; Cotton D; Coast J; Clout M; Calvert MJ; Byrne BE; Brown OD; Blencowe NS; Bera KD; Bennett J; Bamford R; Bakhbakhi D; Atif M; Ashton K; Armstrong E; Andronis L; Ananthavarathan P; Blazeby JM
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Aug; 23(39):1-166. PubMed ID: 31392958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Deep Surgical Site Infection After Surgery for Lower Limb Fractures Associated With Major Trauma: The WHIST Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Costa ML; Achten J; Knight R; Bruce J; Dutton SJ; Madan J; Dritsaki M; Parsons N; Fernandez M; Grant R; Nanchahal J;
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 32044942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infection in obese women after cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Guo C; Cheng T; Li J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):502-511. PubMed ID: 34860421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean is associated with reduced risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yu L; Kronen RJ; Simon LE; Stoll CRT; Colditz GA; Tuuli MG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):200-210.e1. PubMed ID: 28951263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection in women who are obese and give birth by elective caesarean section: A secondary analysis.
    Chaboyer W; Ellwood D; Thalib L; Kumar S; Mahomed K; Kang E; Gillespie BM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 62(2):234-240. PubMed ID: 34506037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings for adults with an open lower limb fracture: the WOLLF RCT.
    Costa ML; Achten J; Bruce J; Davis S; Hennings S; Willett K; Petrou S; Jeffery S; Griffin D; Parker B; Masters J; Lamb SE; Tutton E; Parsons N
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Dec; 22(73):1-162. PubMed ID: 30573002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.