254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30068720)
1. Evaluation of User-Interface Alert Displays for Clinical Decision Support Systems for Sepsis.
Long D; Capan M; Mascioli S; Weldon D; Arnold R; Miller K
Crit Care Nurse; 2018 Aug; 38(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 30068720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reactions of nurses to the use of electronic health record alert features in an inpatient setting.
Sidebottom AC; Collins B; Winden TJ; Knutson A; Britt HR
Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Apr; 30(4):218-26; quiz 227-8. PubMed ID: 22045117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning-Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.
Ginestra JC; Giannini HM; Schweickert WD; Meadows L; Lynch MJ; Pavan K; Chivers CJ; Draugelis M; Donnelly PJ; Fuchs BD; Umscheid CA
Crit Care Med; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 31135500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians' responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods.
Scheepers-Hoeks AM; Grouls RJ; Neef C; Ackerman EW; Korsten EH
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23746663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informatics and interaction: Applying human factors principles to optimize the design of clinical decision support for sepsis.
Schubel L; Mosby DL; Blumenthal J; Capan M; Arnold R; Kowalski R; Seagull FJ; Catchpole K; Schwartz JS; Franklin E; Littlejohn R; Miller KE
Health Informatics J; 2020 Mar; 26(1):642-651. PubMed ID: 31081460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.
Warttig S; Alderson P; Evans DJ; Lewis SR; Kourbeti IS; Smith AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD012404. PubMed ID: 29938790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing modes of computerized sepsis alert notification delivery systems.
Dziadzko MA; Harrison AM; Tiong IC; Pickering BW; Moreno Franco P; Herasevich V
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):156. PubMed ID: 27938401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drug interaction alerts in software--what do general practitioners and pharmacists want?
Yu KH; Sweidan M; Williamson M; Fraser A
Med J Aust; 2011 Dec; 195(11-12):676-80. PubMed ID: 22171864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Heuristic Evaluation to Improve Sepsis Alert Usability.
Pertiwi AAP; Fraczkowski D; Stogis SL; Lopez KD
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2018 Jun; 30(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 29724447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: A systematic review.
Makam AN; Nguyen OK; Auerbach AD
J Hosp Med; 2015 Jun; 10(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 25758641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early recognition and treatment of sepsis in the medical-surgical setting.
Tazbir J
Medsurg Nurs; 2012; 21(4):205-8; quiz 209. PubMed ID: 22966522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of patient preferences in nursing decision-making in evidence-based practice: excellent nurses' communication tools.
Den Hertog R; Niessen T
J Adv Nurs; 2019 Sep; 75(9):1987-1995. PubMed ID: 31148233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions of Pediatric Critical Care Nurses on the Initiation of a Nursing-Led Feeding Protocol.
Kirk AH; Ng BS; Lee AN; Ang B; Lee JH
J Nurs Res; 2015 Dec; 23(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26562462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation and evaluation of sepsis surveillance and decision support in medical ICU and emergency department.
Lipatov K; Daniels CE; Park JG; Elmer J; Hanson AC; Madsen BE; Clements CM; Gajic O; Pickering BW; Herasevich V
Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():378-383. PubMed ID: 34823194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Nature and Variability of Automated Practice Alerts Derived from Electronic Health Records in a U.S. Nationwide Critical Care Research Network.
Benthin C; Pannu S; Khan A; Gong M;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1784-1788. PubMed ID: 27404288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring Clinical Decision Support Influence on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.
Cortez S; Dietrich MS; Wells N
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Jul; 43(4):E170-7. PubMed ID: 27314200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician perspectives of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel drug-gene interaction active clinical decision support alerts.
Nishimura AA; Shirts BH; Salama J; Smith JW; Devine B; Tarczy-Hornoch P
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():117-25. PubMed ID: 26642939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical alerts that cried wolf. As clinical alerts pose physician workflow problems, healthcare IT leaders look for answers.
Perna G
Healthc Inform; 2012 Apr; 29(4):18, 20. PubMed ID: 22574398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alert dwell time: introduction of a measure to evaluate interruptive clinical decision support alerts.
McDaniel RB; Burlison JD; Baker DK; Hasan M; Robertson J; Hartford C; Howard SC; Sablauer A; Hoffman JM
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e138-41. PubMed ID: 26499101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]