BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30068720)

  • 1. Evaluation of User-Interface Alert Displays for Clinical Decision Support Systems for Sepsis.
    Long D; Capan M; Mascioli S; Weldon D; Arnold R; Miller K
    Crit Care Nurse; 2018 Aug; 38(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 30068720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reactions of nurses to the use of electronic health record alert features in an inpatient setting.
    Sidebottom AC; Collins B; Winden TJ; Knutson A; Britt HR
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Apr; 30(4):218-26; quiz 227-8. PubMed ID: 22045117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning-Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.
    Ginestra JC; Giannini HM; Schweickert WD; Meadows L; Lynch MJ; Pavan K; Chivers CJ; Draugelis M; Donnelly PJ; Fuchs BD; Umscheid CA
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 31135500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physicians' responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods.
    Scheepers-Hoeks AM; Grouls RJ; Neef C; Ackerman EW; Korsten EH
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23746663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informatics and interaction: Applying human factors principles to optimize the design of clinical decision support for sepsis.
    Schubel L; Mosby DL; Blumenthal J; Capan M; Arnold R; Kowalski R; Seagull FJ; Catchpole K; Schwartz JS; Franklin E; Littlejohn R; Miller KE
    Health Informatics J; 2020 Mar; 26(1):642-651. PubMed ID: 31081460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.
    Warttig S; Alderson P; Evans DJ; Lewis SR; Kourbeti IS; Smith AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD012404. PubMed ID: 29938790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing modes of computerized sepsis alert notification delivery systems.
    Dziadzko MA; Harrison AM; Tiong IC; Pickering BW; Moreno Franco P; Herasevich V
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):156. PubMed ID: 27938401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drug interaction alerts in software--what do general practitioners and pharmacists want?
    Yu KH; Sweidan M; Williamson M; Fraser A
    Med J Aust; 2011 Dec; 195(11-12):676-80. PubMed ID: 22171864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Heuristic Evaluation to Improve Sepsis Alert Usability.
    Pertiwi AAP; Fraczkowski D; Stogis SL; Lopez KD
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2018 Jun; 30(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 29724447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: A systematic review.
    Makam AN; Nguyen OK; Auerbach AD
    J Hosp Med; 2015 Jun; 10(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 25758641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early recognition and treatment of sepsis in the medical-surgical setting.
    Tazbir J
    Medsurg Nurs; 2012; 21(4):205-8; quiz 209. PubMed ID: 22966522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of patient preferences in nursing decision-making in evidence-based practice: excellent nurses' communication tools.
    Den Hertog R; Niessen T
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Sep; 75(9):1987-1995. PubMed ID: 31148233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of Pediatric Critical Care Nurses on the Initiation of a Nursing-Led Feeding Protocol.
    Kirk AH; Ng BS; Lee AN; Ang B; Lee JH
    J Nurs Res; 2015 Dec; 23(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26562462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and evaluation of sepsis surveillance and decision support in medical ICU and emergency department.
    Lipatov K; Daniels CE; Park JG; Elmer J; Hanson AC; Madsen BE; Clements CM; Gajic O; Pickering BW; Herasevich V
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():378-383. PubMed ID: 34823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Nature and Variability of Automated Practice Alerts Derived from Electronic Health Records in a U.S. Nationwide Critical Care Research Network.
    Benthin C; Pannu S; Khan A; Gong M;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1784-1788. PubMed ID: 27404288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring Clinical Decision Support Influence on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.
    Cortez S; Dietrich MS; Wells N
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Jul; 43(4):E170-7. PubMed ID: 27314200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician perspectives of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel drug-gene interaction active clinical decision support alerts.
    Nishimura AA; Shirts BH; Salama J; Smith JW; Devine B; Tarczy-Hornoch P
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():117-25. PubMed ID: 26642939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical alerts that cried wolf. As clinical alerts pose physician workflow problems, healthcare IT leaders look for answers.
    Perna G
    Healthc Inform; 2012 Apr; 29(4):18, 20. PubMed ID: 22574398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alert dwell time: introduction of a measure to evaluate interruptive clinical decision support alerts.
    McDaniel RB; Burlison JD; Baker DK; Hasan M; Robertson J; Hartford C; Howard SC; Sablauer A; Hoffman JM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e138-41. PubMed ID: 26499101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.