BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30070945)

  • 1. The use of meshes and matrices in breast reconstruction.
    Rolph R; Farhadi J
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2018 Aug; 79(8):454-459. PubMed ID: 30070945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
    Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly.
    Sigalove S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. PubMed ID: 29166346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indications and Controversies for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Biological Meshes.
    Zenn MR
    Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29080660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast reconstruction.
    DellaCroce FJ; Wolfe ET
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 23464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
    Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
    Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct to implant breast reconstruction with biological acellular dermal matrices.
    Teoh V; Gui G
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2020 Mar; 81(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 32240004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Ohlinger R; Nawroth F; Kohlmann T; Alwafai Z; Schueler K; Zygmunt M; Paepke S
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Apr; 41(4):2017-2024. PubMed ID: 33813408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
    Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Biological implant in single-stage reconstruction of mammary gland for cancer].
    Zikiriakhodzhaev AD; Ermoshchenkova MV
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2015; (1):35-40. PubMed ID: 25909549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
    Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Murphy D; O'Donnell JP; Ryan ÉJ; Lane O'Neill B; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):563e-574e. PubMed ID: 36729988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Review of the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Postmastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Chao AH
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2015; 35(3):131-4; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 26313677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
    Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classification and management of seromas in immediate breast reconstruction using the tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix technique.
    Brzezienski MA; Jarrell JA; Mooty RC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 23542848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postsurgical Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients with Prosthesis in Acellular Dermal Matrix: Results from Monocentric Experience.
    Laura B; Alice C; Silvia G; Cristiana B; Giuseppe DT; Antonio A; Giuseppina OM
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2019; 2019():7437324. PubMed ID: 31316828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in One-stage Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Dong JY; Yan Y; Liu MF; Guo ZZ; Guo JY; Ye CS
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2016 Oct; 38(5):607-610. PubMed ID: 27825422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.