These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30071022)

  • 1. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
    Amiri S; Modarres R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
    Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Reis IM; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):893-906. PubMed ID: 10363329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An unconditional exact test for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law: sample-space ordering using the Bayes factor.
    Montoya-Delgado LE; Irony TZ; de B Pereira CA; Whittle MR
    Genetics; 2001 Jun; 158(2):875-83. PubMed ID: 11404348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exact Bayesian p-values for a test of independence in a 2 × 2 contingency table with missing data.
    Lin Y; Lipsitz SR; Sinha D; Fitzmaurice G; Lipshultz S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3411-3419. PubMed ID: 28633606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation accuracy in the psychological sciences.
    Davis-Stober CP; Dana J; Rouder JN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207239. PubMed ID: 30475810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A straightforward multiallelic significance test for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law.
    Lauretto MS; Nakano F; Faria SR; Pereira CA; Stern JM
    Genet Mol Biol; 2009 Jul; 32(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 21637528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
    Garnier-Villarreal M; Jorgensen TD
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 31180693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymptotic versus exact methods in the analysis of contingency tables: Evidence-based practical recommendations.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2569-2582. PubMed ID: 32020833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative?
    Prescott RJ
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing allele homogeneity: the problem of nested hypotheses.
    Izbicki R; Fossaluza V; Hounie AG; Nakano EY; de Bragança Pereira CA
    BMC Genet; 2012 Nov; 13():103. PubMed ID: 23176636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.
    Kelter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1114-1130. PubMed ID: 34471963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.