201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30071470)
21. Assessing the Agreement of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission Ratings Between Audio-Recordings and a Clinic Setting.
Williams JL; Cordero KN; Sitzman TJ
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2023 Jun; ():10556656231185494. PubMed ID: 37357709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
Karnell MP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech-language therapy students' auditory-perceptual judgements of simulated concurrent hypernasality and articulation disorders.
Lee A; Potts S; Bressmann T
Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 May; 34(5):479-492. PubMed ID: 31429313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of inter-judge agreement on perceptual judgment of nasality.
Scarmagnani RH; Oliveira AC; Fukushiro AP; Salgado MH; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
Codas; 2014; 26(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 25388067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relationship between the characteristics of speech and velopharyngeal gap size.
Kummer AW; Briggs M; Lee L
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Nov; 40(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 14577818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors affecting speech in patients with isolated cleft palate. A methodic, clinical and instrumental study.
Haapanen ML
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg Suppl; 1992; 26():1-61. PubMed ID: 1486205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of Perceptual Judgments of Phonetic Accuracy and Hypernasality Among Speech-Language Pathologists for Children With Dysarthria.
Allison KM; Russell M; Hustad KC
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 30(3S):1558-1571. PubMed ID: 33647216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Velopharyngeal function assessment in patients with cleft palate: perceptual speech assessment versus nasopharyngoscopy.
Ma L; Shi B; Li Y; Zheng Q
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1229-31. PubMed ID: 23851775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of listeners' linguistic background on perceptual judgements of hypernasality.
Lee A; Brown S; Gibbon FE
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 22612628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hypernasality in singing among children with cleft palate: a preliminary study.
Peter S; Abdul Rahman ZA; Pillai S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1317-1322. PubMed ID: 31014926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving Perceptual Speech Ratings: The Effects of Auditory Training on Judgments of Dysarthric Speech.
Stipancic KL; Golzy M; Zhao Y; Pinkerton L; Rohl A; Kuruvilla-Dugdale M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 66(11):4236-4258. PubMed ID: 37774738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity of auditory perceptual assessment of velopharyngeal function and dysfunction - the VPC-Sum and the VPC-Rate.
Lohmander A; Hagberg E; Persson C; Willadsen E; Lundeborg I; Davies J; Havstam C; Boers M; Kisling-Møller M; Alaluusua S; Aukner R; Pedersen NH; Turunen L; Nyberg J
Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(7-9):589-597. PubMed ID: 28362219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Models for Predicting Velopharyngeal Competence Based on Speech and Resonance Errors and Velopharyngeal Area Estimation.
Scarmagnani RH; Lohmander A; Salgado MH; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IEK; Yamashita RP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Jun; 61(6):965-975. PubMed ID: 36594481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
Haapanen ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An accelerometric measure as a physical correlate of perceived hypernasality in speech.
Horii Y
J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 6645475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.
Kapsner-Smith MR; Opuszynski A; Stepp CE; Eadie TL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 33909472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
