These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30072311)

  • 21. PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging.
    Shidahara M; Ikoma Y; Kershaw J; Kimura Y; Naganawa M; Watabe H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-86. PubMed ID: 17876550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stochastic nonlinear mixed effects: a metformin case study.
    Matzuka B; Chittenden J; Monteleone J; Tran H
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Feb; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 26585899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.
    Albertini TZ; Medeiros SR; Torres RA; Zocchi SS; Oltjen JW; Strathe AB; Lanna DP
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Nov; 90(11):3867-78. PubMed ID: 22665632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of time-of-flight on indirect 3D and direct 4D parametric image reconstruction in the presence of inconsistent dynamic PET data.
    Kotasidis FA; Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3443-71. PubMed ID: 27049697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling the oxygen uptake kinetics during exercise testing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases using nonlinear mixed models.
    Baty F; Ritz C; van Gestel A; Brutsche M; Gerhard D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():66. PubMed ID: 27245328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Novel parameter estimation methods for 11C-acetate dual-input liver model with dynamic PET.
    Chen S; Feng D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):967-73. PubMed ID: 16686421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using sensitivity equations for computing gradients of the FOCE and FOCEI approximations to the population likelihood.
    Almquist J; Leander J; Jirstrand M
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Jun; 42(3):191-209. PubMed ID: 25801663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of kinetic parameter estimation methods in dynamic FDG-PET studies.
    Dai X; Chen Z; Tian J
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Jan; 32(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 21166088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.
    Häggström I; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Larsson A
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111907. PubMed ID: 25370640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
    Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness.
    Lu X; Huang Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2830-49. PubMed ID: 24623529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of tenofovir plasma and tissue exposure using a population pharmacokinetic model and bootstrap: a simulation study from observed data.
    Collins JW; Heyward Hull J; Dumond JB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2017 Dec; 44(6):631-640. PubMed ID: 29119381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses.
    El Fakhri G; Sitek A; Guérin B; Kijewski MF; Di Carli MF; Moore SC
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1264-71. PubMed ID: 16085581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of adaptive kinetic modelling for bias propagation reduction in direct 4D image reconstruction.
    Kotasidis FA; Matthews JC; Reader AJ; Angelis GI; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(20):6061-84. PubMed ID: 25254427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Error-corrected estimation of regional kinetic parameter histograms directly from pet projections.
    Pölönen H; Niemi J; Ruotsalainen U
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7573-86. PubMed ID: 21098924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bootstrap methods for estimating PET image noise: experimental validation and an application to evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms.
    Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Nakamura K; Yamaguchi H; Kinoshita T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 28(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 24158790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Scatter correction of PET based on non-linear statistical estimate method].
    Wu Z; Chen S; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15762120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic PET image reconstruction integrating temporal regularization associated with respiratory motion correction for applications in oncology.
    Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045012. PubMed ID: 29339575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.