These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30072331)

  • 41. [Expanding control possibilities of myoelectric hand prostheses].
    Reischl M; Mikut R; Pylatiuk C; Schulz S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():868-70. PubMed ID: 12465328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Myoelectric control of robotic lower limb prostheses: a review of electromyography interfaces, control paradigms, challenges and future directions.
    Fleming A; Stafford N; Huang S; Hu X; Ferris DP; Huang HH
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34229307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Prosthetic Hand Body Area Controller Based on Efficient Pattern Recognition Control Strategies.
    Benatti S; Milosevic B; Farella E; Gruppioni E; Benini L
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28420135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A preliminary investigation of the effect of force variation for myoelectric control of hand prosthesis.
    Al-Timemy AH; Bugmann G; Escudero J; Outram N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5758-61. PubMed ID: 24111046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Current Trends and Confounding Factors in Myoelectric Control: Limb Position and Contraction Intensity.
    Campbell E; Phinyomark A; Scheme E
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32183215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Estimation of grasping force from features of intramuscular EMG signals with mirrored bilateral training.
    Kamavuako EN; Farina D; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 22006428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Feature Extraction and Selection for Myoelectric Control Based on Wearable EMG Sensors.
    Phinyomark A; N Khushaba R; Scheme E
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29783659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computational approaches to decode grasping force and velocity level in upper-limb amputee from intraneural peripheral signals.
    Cracchiolo M; Panarese A; Valle G; Strauss I; Granata G; Iorio RD; Stieglitz T; Rossini PM; Mazzoni A; Micera S
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Apr; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Deep learning-based artificial vision for grasp classification in myoelectric hands.
    Ghazaei G; Alameer A; Degenaar P; Morgan G; Nazarpour K
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036025. PubMed ID: 28467317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
    Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Pattern recognition control of multifunction myoelectric prostheses by patients with congenital transradial limb defects: a preliminary study.
    Kryger M; Schultz AE; Kuiken T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 21960053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A multifunctional prosthesis control system based on time series identification of EMG signals using microprocessors.
    Graupe D; Beex AA; Monlux WJ; Magnussen I
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1977; 10(27):4-16. PubMed ID: 603818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Real-Time EMG Based Pattern Recognition Control for Hand Prostheses: A Review on Existing Methods, Challenges and Future Implementation.
    Parajuli N; Sreenivasan N; Bifulco P; Cesarelli M; Savino S; Niola V; Esposito D; Hamilton TJ; Naik GR; Gunawardana U; Gargiulo GD
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31652616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dual Window Pattern Recognition Classifier for Improved Partial-Hand Prosthesis Control.
    Earley EJ; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():58. PubMed ID: 26941599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hargrove LJ; Miller LA; Turner K; Kuiken TA
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13840. PubMed ID: 29062019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Principal components analysis preprocessing for improved classification accuracies in pattern-recognition-based myoelectric control.
    Hargrove LJ; Li G; Englehart KB; Hudgins BS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1407-14. PubMed ID: 19473932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses.
    Young AJ; Kuiken TA; Hargrove LJ
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Oct; 11(5):056021. PubMed ID: 25242111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Voluntary Control of Residual Antagonistic Muscles in Transtibial Amputees: Reciprocal Activation, Coactivation, and Implications for Direct Neural Control of Powered Lower Limb Prostheses.
    Huang S; Huang H
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Jan; 27(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30530332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Grasp specific and user friendly interface design for myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Mohammadi A; Lavranos J; Howe R; Choong P; Oetomo D
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28814052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric control approach for use by transhumeral amputees.
    Alshammary NA; Dalley SA; Goldfarb M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():968-71. PubMed ID: 23366055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.