426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30073498)
21. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 22517955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization of testicular germ cell tumors: Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T.
Min X; Feng Z; Wang L; Cai J; Yan X; Li B; Ke Z; Zhang P; You H
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():25-31. PubMed ID: 29279166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi M; Kozawa E; Tanisaka M; Hasegawa K; Yasuda M; Sakai F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 26605502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diffusion-weighted imaging: Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for detecting pathologic complete response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Choi MH; Oh SN; Rha SE; Choi JI; Lee SH; Jang HS; Kim JG; Grimm R; Son Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 26666560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.
Liu W; Wei C; Bai J; Gao X; Zhou L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Whole Volume Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker to Differentiate Breast Lesions: Correlation with the Ki-67 Proliferation Index.
Guo Y; Kong QC; Li LQ; Tang WJ; Zhang WL; Ning GY; Xue J; Zhou QW; Liang YY; Wu M; Jiang XQ
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():4970265. PubMed ID: 34258262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Volumetric quantitative histogram analysis using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate HCC from other primary liver cancers.
Lewis S; Peti S; Hectors SJ; King M; Rosen A; Kamath A; Putra J; Thung S; Taouli B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):912-922. PubMed ID: 30712136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.
Cheng L; Bai Y; Zhang J; Liu M; Li X; Zhang A; Zhang X; Ma L
Tumour Biol; 2013 Jun; 34(3):1537-45. PubMed ID: 23397543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.
Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):2011-9. PubMed ID: 21562806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Whole-Tumor Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for Differentiating Thymic Carcinoma from Lymphoma.
Zhang W; Zhou Y; Xu XQ; Kong LY; Xu H; Yu TF; Shi HB; Feng Q
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):358-365. PubMed ID: 29520195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
Ma X; Xu L; Ma F; Zhang J; Zhang G; Qiang J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 164(3):1174-1183. PubMed ID: 37925611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo-planar imaging valuable for predicting molecular subtypes of breast cancer?
Li X; Zhu H; Sun K; Chai W; Fu C; Yan F
Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110232. PubMed ID: 35259708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Whole solid tumour volume histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating high-grade from low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: correlation with Ki-67 proliferation status.
Li HM; Zhang R; Gu WY; Zhao SH; Lu N; Zhang GF; Peng WJ; Qiang JW
Clin Radiol; 2019 Dec; 74(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 31471063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The volumetric ADC histogram analysis in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from endometrial polyp.
Zhao Y; You C; Zhou X; Li X; Zhang C; Wu Y; Shen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1158):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 38662891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site using whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps.
Lian S; Zhang C; Chi J; Huang Y; Shi F; Xie C
Radiol Med; 2020 Jul; 125(7):647-653. PubMed ID: 32072391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Whole-tumour diffusion kurtosis MR imaging histogram analysis of rectal adenocarcinoma: Correlation with clinical pathologic prognostic factors.
Cui Y; Yang X; Du X; Zhuo Z; Xin L; Cheng X
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 29063250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
