429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30073498)
61. Differentiation of prostate cancer and stromal hyperplasia in the transition zone with histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Xiaohang L; Bingni Z; Liangping Z; Weijun P; Xiaoqun Y; Yong Z
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1528-1534. PubMed ID: 28286980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Differentiation of orbital lymphoma and idiopathic orbital inflammatory pseudotumor: combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI and histogram analysis of ADC maps.
Ren J; Yuan Y; Wu Y; Tao X
BMC Med Imaging; 2018 May; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 29716527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram as a quantitative biomarker to preoperatively differentiate stage IA endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions.
Zhang J; Yu X; Zhang X; Chen S; Song Y; Xie L; Chen Y; Ouyang H
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Aug; 22(1):139. PubMed ID: 35941559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Comparison between borderline ovarian tumors and carcinomas using semi-automated histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging: focusing on solid components.
Mimura R; Kato F; Tha KK; Kudo K; Konno Y; Oyama-Manabe N; Kato T; Watari H; Sakuragi N; Shirato H
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 26798066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. ADC histogram analysis for adrenal tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating adrenal adenoma from pheochromocytoma.
Umanodan T; Fukukura Y; Kumagae Y; Shindo T; Nakajo M; Takumi K; Nakajo M; Hakamada H; Umanodan A; Yoshiura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1195-1203. PubMed ID: 27571307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Utility of whole-lesion ADC histogram metrics for assessing the malignant potential of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).
Hoffman DH; Ream JM; Hajdu CH; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 27900458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Correlation between molecular prognostic factors and magnetic resonance imaging intravoxel incoherent motion histogram parameters in breast cancer.
Feng W; Gao Y; Lu XR; Xu YS; Guo ZZ; Lei JQ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jan; 85():262-270. PubMed ID: 34740800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Pathological characteristics and risk stratification in patients with stage I endometrial cancer: utility of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.
An T; Kim CK
Br J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 94(1126):20210151. PubMed ID: 34233478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Discrimination between benign and malignant testicular lesions using volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.
Fan C; Min X; Feng Z; Cai W; Li B; Zhang P; You H; Xie J; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108939. PubMed ID: 32171915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Whole-lesion histogram analysis metrics of the apparent diffusion coefficient: a correlation study with histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Xu YS; Liu HF; Xi DL; Li JK; Liu Z; Yan RF; Lei JQ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Sep; 44(9):3089-3098. PubMed ID: 31256226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient in primary rectal tumors: is there a benefit in performing histogram analyses?
van Heeswijk MM; Lambregts DMJ; Maas M; Lahaye MJ; Ayas Z; Slenter JMGM; Beets GL; Bakers FCH; Beets-Tan RGH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1627-1636. PubMed ID: 28160039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Ochi M; Kuroiwa T; Sunami S; Murakami J; Miyahara S; Nagaie T; Oya M; Yabuuchi H; Hatakenaka M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 22161277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Whole-tumor MRI histogram analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlations with Ki-67 labeling index.
Hu XX; Yang ZX; Liang HY; Ding Y; Grimm R; Fu CX; Liu H; Yan X; Ji Y; Zeng MS; Rao SX
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):383-392. PubMed ID: 27862582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Could breast multiparametric MRI discriminate between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma?
Rizzo V; Cicciarelli F; Galati F; Moffa G; Maroncelli R; Pasculli M; Pediconi F
Acta Radiol; 2024 Jun; 65(6):565-574. PubMed ID: 38196268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status.
Chou SS; Gombos EC; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS; Jayender J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1748-1759. PubMed ID: 28371110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?
Rahbar H; Parsian S; Lam DL; Dontchos BN; Andeen NK; Rendi MH; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 26365872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zou X; Luo Y; Li Z; Hu Y; Li H; Tang H; Shen Y; Hu D; Kamel IR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):975-983. PubMed ID: 30277628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Three-compartment spectral diffusion analysis for breast cancer magnetic resonance imaging.
Ogawa M; Kan H; Urano M; Kawai T; Nakajima H; Murai K; Miyaji H; Toyama T; Hiwatashi A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Nov; 103():179-184. PubMed ID: 37178723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Method Versus a Traditional 2-Dimensional Measurement Method for Identifying Non-Puerperal Mastitis From Breast Cancer at 3.0 T.
Tang Q; Li Q; Xie D; Chu K; Liu L; Liao C; Qin Y; Wang Z; Su D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(5):776-783. PubMed ID: 29787501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]