These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30073685)

  • 1. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation procedures for stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Grayling MJ; Mander AP; Wason JMS
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):903-916. PubMed ID: 30073685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation in crossover trials balanced for period.
    Grayling MJ; Mander AP; Wason JMS
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):917-933. PubMed ID: 30073679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The current use of feasibility studies in the assessment of feasibility for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.
    Kristunas CA; Hemming K; Eborall H; Eldridge S; Gray LJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):12. PubMed ID: 30630416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded and unblinded internal pilot study designs for clinical trials with count data.
    Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Biom J; 2013 Jul; 55(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 23703749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    Harrison LJ; Chen T; Wang R
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):951-962. PubMed ID: 31625596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.
    Nevins P; Ryan M; Davis-Plourde K; Ouyang Y; Pereira Macedo JA; Meng C; Tong G; Wang X; Ortiz-Reyes L; Caille A; Li F; Taljaard M
    Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 37990575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Follow up after sample size re-estimation in a breast cancer randomized trial for disease-free survival.
    Hade EM; Young GS; Love RR
    Trials; 2019 Aug; 20(1):527. PubMed ID: 31443726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power calculation for detecting interaction effect in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an important tool for disparity research.
    Yang C; Berkalieva A; Mazumdar M; Kwon D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38431550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in low-resource settings.
    Joag K; Ambrosio G; Kestler E; Weijer C; Hemming K; Van der Graaf R
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):703. PubMed ID: 31852547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice?
    Hemming K; Taljaard M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):1043-1052. PubMed ID: 32386407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():137-46. PubMed ID: 26344808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs.
    Hemming K; Lilford R; Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 25346484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical and epistemic issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trials.
    Federico CA; Heagerty PJ; Lantos J; O'Rourke P; Rahimzadeh V; Sugarman J; Weinfurt K; Wendler D; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Apr; 115():106703. PubMed ID: 35176501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; de Gruttola V; Lipsitch M
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):815-844. PubMed ID: 31876979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hybrid approach to comparing parallel-group and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with a continuous primary outcome when there is uncertainty in the intra-cluster correlation.
    Sarkodie SK; Wason JM; Grayling MJ
    Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 20(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 36086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.
    Kristunas C; Morris T; Gray L
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e017151. PubMed ID: 29146637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Forbes A
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 28259174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Tian Z; Preisser JS; Esserman D; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):419-439. PubMed ID: 34596912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.
    Harrison LJ; Wang R
    Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6674-6688. PubMed ID: 34558112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.