These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30074617)

  • 1. Artificial Sphincters to Manage Urinary Incontinence: A Review.
    Marziale L; Lucarini G; Mazzocchi T; Gruppioni E; Castellano S; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Pistolesi D; Ricotti L; Menciassi A
    Artif Organs; 2018 Sep; 42(9):E215-E233. PubMed ID: 30074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
    Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
    Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
    Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome after placement of an artificial urethral sphincter in 27 dogs.
    Reeves L; Adin C; McLoughlin M; Ham K; Chew D
    Vet Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 23163231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation by a single surgeon in 15 years.
    Shen YC; Chiang PH
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2013 Mar; 29(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 23465419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practice-do we treat a different patient?
    Farag F; van der Doelen M; van Breda J; D'Hauwers K; Heesakkers J
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1350-1355. PubMed ID: 27580297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience.
    Biardeau X; Rizk J; Marcelli F; Flamand V
    Eur Urol; 2015 May; 67(5):937-42. PubMed ID: 25582931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
    Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis of the interaction phenomena between artificial urinary sphincter and urethral duct.
    Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Carniel EL
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 36(3):e3308. PubMed ID: 31945261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A state-of-the-art review on the evolution of urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: past, present and future innovations.
    Chung E
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014 Aug; 38(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 24936961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial urinary sphincter, Part I: Overview.
    Quallich SA; Ohl DA
    Urol Nurs; 2003 Aug; 23(4):259-62, 267-8. PubMed ID: 14552071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
    Gnessin E; Livne PM; Baniel J; Gillon G
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):592-4. PubMed ID: 15473584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.
    Santos AC; Rodrigues LO; Azevedo DC; Carvalho LM; Fernandes MR; Avelar SO; Horta MG; Kelles SM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(1):150-154. PubMed ID: 28124538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newer and novel artificial urinary sphincters (AUS): the development of alternatives to the current AUS device.
    Chung E; Ranaweera M; Cartmill R
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110 Suppl 4():5-11. PubMed ID: 23194117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy.
    Ravier E; Fassi-Fehri H; Crouzet S; Gelet A; Abid N; Martin X
    BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 24731208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The AMS 800 sphincter in urinary incontinence after prostatic surgery. Apropos of 16 patients].
    Koutani A; Lechevallier E; Coulange C
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1997; 31(6-7):382-5. PubMed ID: 9509243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen the risk of urethral atrophy?
    Elliott DS; Barrett DM; Gohma M; Boone TB
    Urology; 2001 Jun; 57(6):1051-4. PubMed ID: 11377302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine.
    Lai HH; Hsu EI; Teh BS; Butler EB; Boone TB
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1021-5. PubMed ID: 17296403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
    Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.