These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30074864)

  • 1. Testing and metacognition: retrieval practise effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text.
    Barenberg J; Dutke S
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):269-279. PubMed ID: 30074864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.
    Händel M; Fritzsche ES
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 26438233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?
    Karpicke JD; Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 19358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do students really prefer repeated rereading over testing when studying textbooks? A reexamination.
    Kuhbandner C; Emmerdinger KJ
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):952-961. PubMed ID: 31045483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognitive changes and sources of confidence judgements in health professions classroom learning.
    Persky AM; Dinsmore DL
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Apr; 11(4):338-345. PubMed ID: 31040009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice.
    Zhang M; Chen X; Liu XL
    Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 30295147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.
    Kelemen WL; Frost PJ; Weaver CA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 10714142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children's test performance.
    Roebers CM; Schmid C; Roderer T
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2009 Dec; 79(Pt 4):749-67. PubMed ID: 19341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supporting metacognitive monitoring in mathematics learning for young people with autism spectrum disorder: A classroom-based study.
    Maras K; Gamble T; Brosnan M
    Autism; 2019 Jan; 23(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 29069914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metacognitive accuracy across cognitive and physical task domains.
    Hildenbrand L; Sanchez CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 35199328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of mood and retrieval cues on semantic memory and metacognition.
    Hall ACG; Evans DG; Higginbotham L; Thompson KS
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):333-347. PubMed ID: 32196673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognition for strategy selection during arithmetic problem-solving in young and older adults.
    Geurten M; Lemaire P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2019 May; 26(3):424-446. PubMed ID: 29671692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring Metacognitive Knowledge, Monitoring, and Control in the Pharmacy Classroom and Experiential Settings.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Persky AM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2020 May; 84(5):7730. PubMed ID: 32577037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between parent involvement and academic achievement through metacognitive strategies: A multiple multilevel mediation analysis.
    Veas A; Castejón JL; Miñano P; Gilar-Corbí R
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Jun; 89(2):393-411. PubMed ID: 30198550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
    Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.