These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30075648)

  • 21. Influence of thread shape and inclination on the biomechanical behaviour of plateau implant systems.
    Calì M; Zanetti EM; Oliveri SM; Asero R; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Bignardi C
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):460-469. PubMed ID: 29395470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.
    Mathieu V; Vayron R; Richard G; Lambert G; Naili S; Meningaud JP; Haiat G
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24268798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of bone anchored hearing aids using a finite element model and its applications to implant stability assessment.
    Mohamed M; Westover L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Oct; 60(10):2779-2795. PubMed ID: 35857252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Debonding of coin-shaped osseointegrated implants: Coupling of experimental and numerical approaches.
    Hériveaux Y; Le Cann S; Immel K; Vennat E; Nguyen VH; Brailovski V; Karasinski P; Sauer RA; Haïat G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105787. PubMed ID: 36989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A modified Coulomb's law for the tangential debonding of osseointegrated implants.
    Immel K; Duong TX; Nguyen VH; Haïat G; Sauer RA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Jun; 19(3):1091-1108. PubMed ID: 31916014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena.
    Fraulob M; Vayron R; Le Cann S; Lecuelle B; Hériveaux Y; Albini Lomami H; Flouzat Lachaniette CH; Haïat G
    Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21962. PubMed ID: 33319800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants.
    Van Oosterwyck H; Duyck J; Vander Sloten J; Van der Perre G; De Cooman M; Lievens S; Puers R; Naert I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Dec; 9(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 11429942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant/bone interface.
    Gao SS; Zhang YR; Zhu ZL; Yu HY
    Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Dec; 4(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 23258381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Yeung TC; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):e49-57. PubMed ID: 22848900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study and characterization of the crest module design: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Costa C; Peixinho N; Silva JP; Carvalho S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 25794909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasonic evaluation of dental implant osseointegration.
    Vayron R; Soffer E; Anagnostou F; Haïat G
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3562-8. PubMed ID: 25262877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High bone-implant contact achieved by photofunctionalization to reduce periimplant stress: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ohyama T; Uchida T; Shibuya N; Nakabayashi S; Ishigami T; Ogawa T
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 23314350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resonant frequency analysis of dental implants.
    Rittel D; Dorogoy A; Haïat G; Shemtov-Yona K
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Apr; 66():65-74. PubMed ID: 30837120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.