These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30075658)

  • 1. Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.
    Park SJ; Yeung G; Vesselinova N; Kreiman J; Keating PA; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):375. PubMed ID: 30075658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speaker discrimination performance for "easy" versus "hard" voices in style-matched and -mismatched speech.
    Afshan A; Kreiman J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1393. PubMed ID: 35232083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Hahn YC
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):e223-32. PubMed ID: 20971612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-time speaker verification with different speaking style utterances.
    Mao H; Shi Y; Liu Y; Wei L; Li Y; Long Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241809. PubMed ID: 33175898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison.
    Leemann A; Kolly MJ; Dellwo V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():59-67. PubMed ID: 24675042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
    Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaker Adaptation on Articulation and Acoustics for Articulation-to-Speech Synthesis.
    Cao B; Wisler A; Wang J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension.
    Fleming D; Giordano BL; Caldara R; Belin P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(38):13795-8. PubMed ID: 25201950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speaking in the presence of noise: Consistency of acoustic properties in clear-Lombard speech over time.
    Shen C; Cooke M; Janse E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2165. PubMed ID: 37092911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A test of the effectiveness of speaker verification for differentiating between identical twins.
    Ariyaeeinia A; Morrison C; Malegaonkar A; Black S
    Sci Justice; 2008 Dec; 48(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 19192680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Simplified Vocal Profile Analysis Protocol for the Assessment of Voice Quality and Speaker Similarity.
    San Segundo E; Mompean JA
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):644.e11-644.e27. PubMed ID: 28215407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rhythmic variability between speakers: articulatory, prosodic, and linguistic factors.
    Dellwo V; Leemann A; Kolly MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1513-28. PubMed ID: 25786962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29195438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.