These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in-noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children. MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Fels J; Ljung R Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):567-577. PubMed ID: 30137681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited. Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children. Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises. Desjardins JL; Doherty KA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech. Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring Mandarin Speech Recognition Thresholds Using the Method of Adaptive Tracking. Wang Y; Lu Z; Yang X; Liu C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):2009-2017. PubMed ID: 31112665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do age and linguistic background alter the audiovisual advantage when listening to speech in the presence of energetic and informational masking? Avivi-Reich M; Puka K; Schneider BA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):242-261. PubMed ID: 29039045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech. Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20. PubMed ID: 16875228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker? Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors. Best V; Ozmeral E; Gallun FJ; Sen K; Shinn-Cunningham BG J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3766-73. PubMed ID: 16419821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]