394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30076095)
1. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.
Englert M; Lima L; Behlau M
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):810.e11-810.e17. PubMed ID: 31005448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.
Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G
J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B
J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language].
Choynzonov EL; Kononova LA; Krasavina EA; Kulbakin DE; Mukhina VI
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(5):34-38. PubMed ID: 36404688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.
Englert M; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Behlau M
J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):160.e15-160.e21. PubMed ID: 31474432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI for brazilian portuguese speakers: analysis of different speech material.
Englert M; Lima L; Constantini AC; Latoszek BBV; Maryn Y; Behlau M
Codas; 2019 Feb; 31(1):e20180082. PubMed ID: 30758396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.
Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M
J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
