284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30077873)
1. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of spermatozoa using a novel 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay for forensic examination of sexual assaults.
Liu KL; Tsai LC; Lin YC; Huang NE; Yang LJ; Su CW; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1991-2004. PubMed ID: 32266534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
Wong H; Mihalovich J
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Old meets new: Comparative examination of conventional and innovative RNA-based methods for body fluid identification of laundered seminal fluid stains after modular extraction of DNA and RNA.
Kulstein G; Schacker U; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():130-140. PubMed ID: 29990825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraction of DNA from Sperm Cells in Mixed Stain by Nylon Membrane Bushing Separation Technique.
Ma J; Tong Q; Gao LB; Zhu C; Jiang ZQ
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 34(4):417-419. PubMed ID: 30465410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel co-amplification system for simultaneous amplification of 23 Y-STR and identification of spermatozoa.
Lin YC; Tsai LC; Liu KL; Huang NE; Yang LJ; Su CW; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Jan; 136(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 34713334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a novel method "SpermX™" for high throughput differential extraction processing of sexual assault kits (SAKs) for DNA analysis.
Sinha SK; Brown H; Holt H; Khan MR; Brown R; Sgueglia JB; Loftus A; Murphy G; Montgomery A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102690. PubMed ID: 35338894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21288791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review: Properties of sperm and seminal fluid, informed by research on reproduction and contraception.
Cotton RW; Fisher MB
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Sep; 18():66-77. PubMed ID: 25817211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.
Clark CP; Xu K; Scott O; Hickey J; Tsuei AC; Jackson K; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():42-49. PubMed ID: 30954892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
