260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30078542)
1. The effects of high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) on global motion processing: An equivalent noise approach.
Ghin F; Pavan A; Contillo A; Mather G
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(6):1263-1275. PubMed ID: 30078542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modulatory mechanisms underlying high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS): A combined stochastic resonance and equivalent noise approach.
Pavan A; Ghin F; Contillo A; Milesi C; Campana G; Mather G
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(4):967-977. PubMed ID: 30833217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over V5 improves motion perception by signal enhancement and noise reduction.
Battaglini L; Noventa S; Casco C
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 28487047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential effects of high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) on contrast sensitivity and visual acuity when combined with a short perceptual training in adults with amblyopia.
Moret B; Camilleri R; Pavan A; Lo Giudice G; Veronese A; Rizzo R; Campana G
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():125-133. PubMed ID: 29704524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement in visual perception after high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS) in those with migraine: An equivalent noise approach.
O'Hare L; Goodwin P; Sharp A; Contillo A; Pavan A
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Oct; 161():107990. PubMed ID: 34403655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.
Haeckert J; Lasser C; Pross B; Hasan A; Strube W
Physiol Rep; 2020 Oct; 8(19):e14595. PubMed ID: 32996722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological aftereffects of high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (hf-tRNS): an EEG investigation.
Ghin F; O'Hare L; Pavan A
Exp Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 239(8):2399-2418. PubMed ID: 34105019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
Murphy OW; Hoy KE; Wong D; Bailey NW; Fitzgerald PB; Segrave RA
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(5):1370-1380. PubMed ID: 32659482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving motion detection via anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
Battaglini L; Mena F; Casco C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2020; 38(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 33016896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise in the brain: Transcranial random noise stimulation and perceptual noise act on a stochastic resonance-like mechanism.
Battaglini L; Casco C; Fertonani A; Miniussi C; Di Ponzio M; Vicovaro M
Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 57(12):2097-2111. PubMed ID: 36922400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The application of online transcranial random noise stimulation and perceptual learning in the improvement of visual functions in mild myopia.
Camilleri R; Pavan A; Campana G
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():225-231. PubMed ID: 27343685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-frequency TRNS reduces BOLD activity during visuomotor learning.
Saiote C; Polanía R; Rosenberger K; Paulus W; Antal A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59669. PubMed ID: 23527247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transcranial electrical stimulation regimens for effects on inhibitory circuit activity in primary somatosensory cortex and tactile spatial discrimination performance.
Saito K; Otsuru N; Inukai Y; Miyaguchi S; Yokota H; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Onishi H
Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 375():112168. PubMed ID: 31442547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterising modulatory effects of high-intensity high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation using the perceptual template model.
Gotsis ES; van Boxtel JJA; Teufel C; Edwards M; Christensen BK
Neuropsychologia; 2023 Dec; 191():108703. PubMed ID: 37858920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of global motion discrimination in school aged children.
Bogfjellmo LG; Bex PJ; Falkenberg HK
J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24569985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over prefrontal cortex does not influence the evaluation of facial emotions.
Prete G; Laeng B; Tommasi L
Soc Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 14(6):676-680. PubMed ID: 30417751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulation of the dichotic right ear advantage during bilateral but not unilateral transcranial random noise stimulation.
Prete G; D'Anselmo A; Tommasi L; Brancucci A
Brain Cogn; 2018 Jun; 123():81-88. PubMed ID: 29547746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanistic account of the left auditory cortex for tone-matching in schizophrenia: A pilot transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) sham-controlled study.
Dondé C; Fivel L; Haesebaert F; Poulet E; Mondino M; Brunelin J
Asian J Psychiatr; 2024 Feb; 92():103879. PubMed ID: 38157711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modulation of Illusory Auditory Perception by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.
Prete G; D'Anselmo A; Tommasi L; Brancucci A
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():351. PubMed ID: 28676740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
