These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30078625)

  • 1. Tactile sensitivity thresholds for the radial hemi-pulp of the index: A comparison between the Semmes-Weinstein and Cochet-Bonnet tests in 25 healthy subjects.
    Grobnicu O; Vinée F; Igeta Y; Xavier F; Bourcier T; Liverneaux P
    Hand Surg Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 37(5):295-299. PubMed ID: 30078625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile sensitivity as a function of age.
    Thornbury JM; Mistretta CM
    J Gerontol; 1981 Jan; 36(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 7451834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical usefulness of the two-site Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
    Lee S; Kim H; Choi S; Park Y; Kim Y; Cho B
    J Korean Med Sci; 2003 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 12589096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.
    Tremblay F; Mireault AC; Dessureault L; Manning H; Sveistrup H
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15754171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the cutaneous sensation of leprosy-suspected lesions using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and quantitative thermal testing.
    Villarroel MF; Orsini MB; Lima RC; Antunes CM
    Lepr Rev; 2007 Jun; 78(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17824480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration of contact time alters cutaneous pressure threshold measurements.
    van Vliet D; Novak CB; Mackinnon SE
    Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Oct; 31(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 8239434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the electrical perceptual threshold and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament tests of cutaneous sensibility.
    Ellaway PH; Catley M
    Spinal Cord; 2013 Feb; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 22945746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nasal tactile sensitivity in allergic rhinitis.
    Salzano FA; Mora R; Penco S; Traverso D; Gaggero G; Salzano G; Guastini L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):640-4. PubMed ID: 21395473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
    McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK
    Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the sensory function of the ocular surface: implications of use of a non-contact air jet aesthesiometer versus the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.
    Golebiowski B; Papas E; Stapleton F
    Exp Eye Res; 2011 May; 92(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 21376718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference in sensibility between the dominant and nondominant index finger as tested using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments pressure aesthesiometer.
    Hage JJ; van der Steen LP; de Groot PJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Mar; 20(2):227-9. PubMed ID: 7775756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interobserver reliability of sensibility testing in asymptomatic individuals.
    Rozental TD; Beredjiklian PK; Guyette TM; Weiland AJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2000 Jun; 44(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 10884076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference values for touch sensibility thresholds in healthy Nepalese volunteers.
    Kets CM; Van Leerdam ME; Van Brakel WH; Deville W; Bertelsmann FW
    Lepr Rev; 1996 Mar; 67(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 8820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epicritic sensation in cervical spinal cord injury: diagnostic gains beyond testing light touch.
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Baumberger M; Rietman JS; Curt A
    J Neurotrauma; 2013 Aug; 30(15):1342-8. PubMed ID: 23895137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive procedure for routine measurement of light-touch sensitivity threshold.
    Berquin AD; Lijesevic V; Blond S; Plaghki L
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Sep; 42(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 20665509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of sensory testing on different toe surfaces: implications for neuropathy screening.
    Dimitrakoudis D; Bril V
    Neurology; 2002 Aug; 59(4):611-3. PubMed ID: 12196660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory evaluation of the hands in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.
    Schreuders TA; Selles RW; van Ginneken BT; Janssen WG; Stam HJ
    J Hand Ther; 2008; 21(1):28-34; quiz 35. PubMed ID: 18215749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensory function assessment. A pilot comparison study of touch pressure threshold with texture and tactile discrimination.
    King PM
    J Hand Ther; 1997; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9116804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical analysis of the recovery from sensory disturbance after sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy using a Semmes-Weinstein pressure aesthesiometer.
    Takasaki Y; Noma H; Masaki H; Fujikawa M; Alberdas JL; Tamura H; Ueda E; Takaki T; Yamane G
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 9927905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision making in detecting abnormal Semmes-Weinstein monofilament thresholds in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    MacDermid JC; Kramer JF; Roth JH
    J Hand Ther; 1994; 7(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 7951707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.