These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30079040)

  • 1. Candidate Performance and Observable Audience Response: Laughter and Applause-Cheering During the First 2016 Clinton-Trump Presidential Debate.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Dye RG; Gong ZH; Bucy EP; Wicks RH; Eidelman S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1182. PubMed ID: 30079040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Miller J
    Politics Life Sci; 2019 May; 38(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 31094672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presidential laugh lines. Candidate display behavior and audience laughter in the 2008 primary debates.
    Stewart PA
    Politics Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 29(2):55-72. PubMed ID: 21761981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's third presidential debate.
    Kashif F; Farooqi R; Tariq S; Nusrat A; Ashraf F; Raees A
    Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10518. PubMed ID: 36119880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laughter and effective presidential leadership: A case study of Ronald Reagan as the 'great communicator'.
    Stewart PA; Dye RG; Senior C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301324. PubMed ID: 38630665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-Expressions of Fear During the 2016 Presidential Campaign Trail: Their Influence on Trait Perceptions of Donald Trump.
    Stewart PA; Svetieva E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():608483. PubMed ID: 34149502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Engaging With Contemporary Dance: What Can Body Movements Tell us About Audience Responses?
    Theodorou L; Healey PGT; Smeraldi F
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():71. PubMed ID: 30774609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Psychobiographical and Psycho-Political Comparison of Clinton and Trump.
    Elovitz PH
    J Psychohist; 2016; 44(2):90-113. PubMed ID: 29442485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of audience laughter on men's and women's responses to humor.
    Martin GN; Gray CD
    J Soc Psychol; 1996 Apr; 136(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 8691829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of audience applause.
    Mann RP; Faria J; Sumpter DJ; Krause J
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Aug; 10(85):20130466. PubMed ID: 23782537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assaults on Days of Campaign Rallies During the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Morrison CN; Ukert B; Palumbo A; Dong B; Jacoby SF; Wiebe DJ
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jul; 29(4):490-493. PubMed ID: 29543668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invited and uninvited applause in political speeches.
    Bull P
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 45(Pt 3):563-78. PubMed ID: 16984721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COVID-19 transmission in the first presidential debate in 2020.
    Shao X; Li X
    Phys Fluids (1994); 2020 Nov; 32(11):115125. PubMed ID: 33244216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The applause sign in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related conditions.
    Schönecker S; Hell F; Bötzel K; Wlasich E; Ackl N; Süßmair C; ; Otto M; Anderl-Straub S; Ludolph A; Kassubek J; Huppertz HJ; Diehl-Schmid J; Riedl L; Roßmeier C; Fassbender K; Lyros E; Kornhuber J; Oberstein TJ; Fliessbach K; Schneider A; Schroeter ML; Prudlo J; Lauer M; Jahn H; Levin J; Danek A
    J Neurol; 2019 Feb; 266(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 30506397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
    Bovet A; Morone F; Makse HA
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8673. PubMed ID: 29875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smoking, coughing, laughing and applause: a comparative study of respiratory symbolism.
    Grotjahn M
    Int J Psychoanal; 1972; 53 ( Pt 3)():345-9. PubMed ID: 4143630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Happy warriors" revisited: hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news.
    Bucy EP; Grabe ME
    Politics Life Sci; 2008 Mar; 27(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 19213305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.