These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30080067)

  • 1. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Same-location costs in peripheral cueing: The role of cue awareness and feature changes.
    Schoeberl T; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 28816482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.
    Wang B; Yan C; Wang Z; Olivers CNL; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 27896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ViSA: a neurodynamic model for visuo-spatial working memory, attentional blink, and conscious access.
    Simione L; Raffone A; Wolters G; Salmas P; Nakatani C; Belardinelli MO; van Leeuwen C
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):745-69. PubMed ID: 22823385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects.
    Chen L; Zhu P; Li J; Song H; Liu H; Shen M; Chen H
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105488. PubMed ID: 37178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward masking interrupts spatial attention, slows downstream processing, and limits conscious perception.
    Losier T; Lefebvre C; Doro M; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Sep; 54():101-113. PubMed ID: 28410866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An attentional blink in the absence of spatial attention: a cost of awareness?
    Alef Ophir E; Sherman E; Lamy D
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):1039-1055. PubMed ID: 30264360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional cueing by cross-modal congruency produces both facilitation and inhibition on short-term visual recognition.
    Makovac E; Kwok SC; Gerbino W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():75-83. PubMed ID: 25126752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal.
    Harris AM; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):926-940. PubMed ID: 28230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional cueing reverses deficits in spatial working memory task performance in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys.
    Decamp E; Tinker JP; Schneider JS
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 15196793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
    Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.