These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Biasing visual selection: functional neuroimaging of the interplay between spatial cueing and feature memory guidance. Soto D; Mok AY; McRobbie D; Quest R; Waldman A; Rotshtein P Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1537-43. PubMed ID: 21145902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory. Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation. Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs. Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the interplay between working memory consolidation and attentional selection in controlling conscious access: parallel processing at a cost--a comment on 'The interplay of attention and consciousness in visual search, attentional blink and working memory consolidation'. Wyble B; Bowman H; Nieuwenstein M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Feb; 370(1661):20140197. PubMed ID: 25533105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing. Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Barking up the wrong tree in attentional bias modification? Comparing the sensitivity of four tasks to attentional biases. Sigurjónsdóttir Ó; Sigurðardóttir S; Björnsson AS; Kristjánsson Á J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Sep; 48():9-16. PubMed ID: 25665514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory. Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Working memory dependence of spatial contextual cueing for visual search. Pollmann S Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):372-380. PubMed ID: 29745430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Arrow-elicited cueing effects at short intervals: Rapid attentional orienting or cue-target stimulus conflict? Green JJ; Woldorff MG Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 21975079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]