These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30080706)

  • 1. Concordance of "Case Level" Global, Highest, and Largest Volume Cancer Grade Group on Needle Biopsy Versus Grade Group on Radical Prostatectomy.
    Trpkov K; Sangkhamanon S; Yilmaz A; Medlicott SAC; Donnelly B; Gotto G; Shea-Budgell M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Nov; 42(11):1522-1529. PubMed ID: 30080706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal Method for Reporting Prostate Cancer Grade in MRI-targeted Biopsies.
    Deng FM; Isaila B; Jones D; Ren Q; Kyung P; Hoskoppal D; Huang H; Mirsadraei L; Xia Y; Melamed J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2022 Jan; 46(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 34115670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites.
    Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Mod Pathol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 15475927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimized grade group for reporting prostate cancer grade in systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies.
    He Y; Shen Q; Fu W; Wang H; Song G
    Prostate; 2022 Aug; 82(11):1125-1132. PubMed ID: 35538399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy global grade correlates better than highest grade with prostatectomy grade.
    Ren J; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Wysock JS; Huang WC; Lepor H; Deng FM
    Prostate; 2023 Mar; 83(4):323-330. PubMed ID: 36461793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
    Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
    Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining the optimal method for reporting prostate cancer grade and tumor extent on magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies.
    Gordetsky JB; Schultz L; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena M; Rais-Bahrami S
    Hum Pathol; 2018 Jun; 76():68-75. PubMed ID: 29551676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade.
    Athanazio D; Gotto G; Shea-Budgell M; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
    Histopathology; 2017 Jun; 70(7):1098-1106. PubMed ID: 28370140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
    Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volume of Gleason pattern 4 stratifies risk of metastasis and death in patients with Gleason score 3+5=8/5+3=8 positive prostate core biopsies.
    Acosta AM; Taplin ME; Mata DA; D'Amico AV; Hirsch MS
    Hum Pathol; 2020 May; 99():62-74. PubMed ID: 32171650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
    Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy.
    Ranaweera M; Samaratunga H; Duffy D; Klopfer K; Brunelli M; Martignoni G; Delahunt B
    Pathology; 2011 Dec; 43(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 22002115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
    Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.