BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30080730)

  • 1. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda ME; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George VV; Abbas MA; Peters WR; Maun DC; Chang GJ; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch MG; Wexner SD; Whiteford MH; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin DA; Larson DW; Marcello PW; Posner MC; Read TE; Monson JRT; Wren SM; Pisters PWT; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 30080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson ARL; Solomon MJ; Brown CSB; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 30247332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.
    Keller DS; Khorgami Z; Swendseid B; Champagne BJ; Reynolds HL; Stein SL; Delaney CP
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1940-8. PubMed ID: 24515259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.
    Bonjer HJ; Deijen CL; Abis GA; Cuesta MA; van der Pas MH; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Lacy AM; Bemelman WA; Andersson J; Angenete E; Rosenberg J; Fuerst A; Haglind E;
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1324-32. PubMed ID: 25830422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
    Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.
    Garcia-Aguilar J; Renfro LA; Chow OS; Shi Q; Carrero XW; Lynn PB; Thomas CR; Chan E; Cataldo PA; Marcet JE; Medich DS; Johnson CS; Oommen SC; Wolff BG; Pigazzi A; McNevin SM; Pons RK; Bleday R
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Nov; 16(15):1537-1546. PubMed ID: 26474521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic implications of surgical specimen quality on the oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery in mid and low rectal cancer.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Lapeña-Rodríguez M; Bauzá-Collado M; Huerta M; Roselló-Keränen S; Espí-Macías A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Dec; 406(8):2759-2767. PubMed ID: 34716825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: oncologically equal?].
    Müller-Stich BP; Linke GR; Wagner M; Steinemann DC
    Chirurg; 2016 Jul; 87(7):552-9. PubMed ID: 27364141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Selvindos PB; Ho YH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.
    Pyo DH; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Chun HK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2449-56. PubMed ID: 26304103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Long-term outcomes of a propensity score matched study.
    Seshadri RA; Swaminathan R; Srinivasan A
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 29044538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Initial cT3 Juxta-Anal Rectal Cancer.
    Huang S; Huang Y; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Xu Z; Sun Y; Wang X
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jun; 29(6):809-816. PubMed ID: 30596539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.
    Nienhüser H; Heger P; Schmitz R; Kulu Y; Diener MK; Klose J; Schneider M; Müller-Stich BP; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Mihaljevic AL; Schmidt T
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1418-1433. PubMed ID: 29589264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A single center retrospective study on surgical efficacy of T3NxM0 middle-low rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy].
    Liu P; Lou Z; Mei Z; Gao X; Hao L; Liu L; Gong H; Meng R; Yu E; Wang H; Wang H; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 22(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30703796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.