These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30080730)

  • 1. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda ME; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George VV; Abbas MA; Peters WR; Maun DC; Chang GJ; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch MG; Wexner SD; Whiteford MH; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin DA; Larson DW; Marcello PW; Posner MC; Read TE; Monson JRT; Wren SM; Pisters PWT; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 30080730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson ARL; Solomon MJ; Brown CSB; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Apr; 269(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 30247332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.
    Keller DS; Khorgami Z; Swendseid B; Champagne BJ; Reynolds HL; Stein SL; Delaney CP
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jun; 28(6):1940-8. PubMed ID: 24515259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.
    Bonjer HJ; Deijen CL; Abis GA; Cuesta MA; van der Pas MH; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Lacy AM; Bemelman WA; Andersson J; Angenete E; Rosenberg J; Fuerst A; Haglind E;
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1324-32. PubMed ID: 25830422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
    Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.
    Garcia-Aguilar J; Renfro LA; Chow OS; Shi Q; Carrero XW; Lynn PB; Thomas CR; Chan E; Cataldo PA; Marcet JE; Medich DS; Johnson CS; Oommen SC; Wolff BG; Pigazzi A; McNevin SM; Pons RK; Bleday R
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Nov; 16(15):1537-1546. PubMed ID: 26474521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic implications of surgical specimen quality on the oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery in mid and low rectal cancer.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Lapeña-Rodríguez M; Bauzá-Collado M; Huerta M; Roselló-Keränen S; Espí-Macías A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Dec; 406(8):2759-2767. PubMed ID: 34716825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: oncologically equal?].
    Müller-Stich BP; Linke GR; Wagner M; Steinemann DC
    Chirurg; 2016 Jul; 87(7):552-9. PubMed ID: 27364141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Selvindos PB; Ho YH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.
    Pyo DH; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Chun HK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2449-56. PubMed ID: 26304103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Long-term outcomes of a propensity score matched study.
    Seshadri RA; Swaminathan R; Srinivasan A
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 29044538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Initial cT3 Juxta-Anal Rectal Cancer.
    Huang S; Huang Y; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Xu Z; Sun Y; Wang X
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jun; 29(6):809-816. PubMed ID: 30596539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.
    Nienhüser H; Heger P; Schmitz R; Kulu Y; Diener MK; Klose J; Schneider M; Müller-Stich BP; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Mihaljevic AL; Schmidt T
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1418-1433. PubMed ID: 29589264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A single center retrospective study on surgical efficacy of T3NxM0 middle-low rectal cancer without neoadjuvant therapy].
    Liu P; Lou Z; Mei Z; Gao X; Hao L; Liu L; Gong H; Meng R; Yu E; Wang H; Wang H; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 22(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30703796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.