BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30081875)

  • 1. Prediction models for clustered data with informative priors for the random effects: a simulation study.
    Ni H; Groenwold RHH; Nielen M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30081875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expert opinion as priors for random effects in Bayesian prediction models: Subclinical ketosis in dairy cows as an example.
    Ni H; Klugkist I; van der Drift S; Jorritsma R; Hooijer G; Nielen M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244752. PubMed ID: 33444385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian hierarchical model for mortality data from cluster-sampling household surveys in humanitarian crises.
    Heudtlass P; Guha-Sapir D; Speybroeck N
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1255-1263. PubMed ID: 29860332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
    Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian Estimation with Informative Priors is Indistinguishable from Data Falsification.
    García-Pérez MÁ
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 22():E45. PubMed ID: 31640834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors.
    Guo J; Riebler A; Rue H
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3039-3058. PubMed ID: 28474394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applications of Bayesian shrinkage prior models in clinical research with categorical responses.
    Bhattacharyya A; Pal S; Mitra R; Rai S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35484507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequentist performances of Bayesian prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis.
    Hamaguchi Y; Noma H; Nagashima K; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
    Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):394-405. PubMed ID: 33164247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different Roles of Prior Distributions in the Single Mediator Model with Latent Variables.
    Miočević M; Levy R; MacKinnon DP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):20-40. PubMed ID: 32003232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating different approaches to develop informative priors in hierarchical Bayesian safety performance functions.
    Yu R; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jul; 56():51-8. PubMed ID: 23612558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selected aspects of prior and likelihood information for a Bayesian classifier in a road safety analysis.
    Nowakowska M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():97-106. PubMed ID: 28213206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation.
    Depaoli S
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 23527607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information.
    Schmidli H; Gsteiger S; Roychoudhury S; O'Hagan A; Spiegelhalter D; Neuenschwander B
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25355546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes.
    Li B; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():77. PubMed ID: 21605357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk prediction in multicentre studies when there is confounding by cluster or informative cluster size.
    Pavlou M; Ambler G; Omar RZ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 34218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
    Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.