255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30081912)
21. Effects of visual stimulation on LFPs, spikes, and LFP-spike relations in PRR.
Hwang EJ; Andersen RA
J Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 105(4):1850-60. PubMed ID: 21307325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual cortex neurons phase-lock selectively to subsets of LFP oscillations.
Swindale NV; Spacek MA
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jun; 121(6):2364-2378. PubMed ID: 30995166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamics of the functional link between area MT LFPs and motion detection.
Smith JE; Beliveau V; Schoen A; Remz J; Zhan CA; Cook EP
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):80-98. PubMed ID: 25948867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in visual cortex.
Ramalingam N; McManus JN; Li W; Gilbert CD
J Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 33(5):1773-89. PubMed ID: 23365217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.
Luck SJ; Chelazzi L; Hillyard SA; Desimone R
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jan; 77(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 9120566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Local field potential in cortical area MT: stimulus tuning and behavioral correlations.
Liu J; Newsome WT
J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 26(30):7779-90. PubMed ID: 16870724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Routing information flow by separate neural synchrony frequencies allows for "functionally labeled lines" in higher primate cortex.
Khamechian MB; Kozyrev V; Treue S; Esghaei M; Daliri MR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(25):12506-12515. PubMed ID: 31147468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli.
Motter BC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Sep; 70(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 8229178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Covariation between Spike and LFP Modulations Revealed with Focal and Asynchronous Stimulation of Receptive Field Surround in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex.
Kim K; Kim T; Yoon T; Lee C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144929. PubMed ID: 26670337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attention influences single unit and local field potential response latencies in visual cortical area V4.
Sundberg KA; Mitchell JF; Gawne TJ; Reynolds JH
J Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 32(45):16040-50. PubMed ID: 23136440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Synchronization between frontal eye field and area V4 during free-gaze visual search.
Yan T; Zhou HH
Zool Res; 2019 Sep; 40(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 31393096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length, and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey.
Cheng K; Hasegawa T; Saleem KS; Tanaka K
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jun; 71(6):2269-80. PubMed ID: 7931516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast sensitivity of MT receptive field centers and surrounds.
Tsui JM; Pack CC
J Neurophysiol; 2011 Oct; 106(4):1888-900. PubMed ID: 21753021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A theta rhythm in macaque visual cortex and its attentional modulation.
Spyropoulos G; Bosman CA; Fries P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jun; 115(24):E5614-E5623. PubMed ID: 29848632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparisons of the dynamics of local field potential and multiunit activity signals in macaque visual cortex.
Burns SP; Xing D; Shapley RM
J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(41):13739-49. PubMed ID: 20943914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attention strengthens across-trial pre-stimulus phase coherence in visual cortex, enhancing stimulus processing.
Zareian B; Maboudi K; Daliri MR; Abrishami Moghaddam H; Treue S; Esghaei M
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4837. PubMed ID: 32179777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Unbiased and robust quantification of synchronization between spikes and local field potential.
Li Z; Cui D; Li X
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Aug; 269():33-8. PubMed ID: 27180930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatial spread of the local field potential and its laminar variation in visual cortex.
Xing D; Yeh CI; Shapley RM
J Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 29(37):11540-9. PubMed ID: 19759301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spike-field Granger causality for hybrid neural data analysis.
Gong X; Li W; Liang H
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):809-822. PubMed ID: 31242046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Decoding of Attentional State Using High-Frequency Local Field Potential Is As Accurate As Using Spikes.
Prakash SS; Das A; Kanth ST; Mayo JP; Ray S
Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jul; 31(9):4314-4328. PubMed ID: 33866366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
