168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30082523)
1. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
Rau PP; Zheng J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vision dominates at the preresponse level and audition dominates at the response level in cross-modal interaction: behavioral and neural evidence.
Chen Q; Zhou X
J Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 33(17):7109-21. PubMed ID: 23616521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
Leonhard T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.
Marti S; Sigman M; Dehaene S
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2883-98. PubMed ID: 21988891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociating central and auditory attention: Is there a shared bottleneck for response selection and auditory search?
Kattner F; Reimer CB
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 32419615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.
Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; Park CJ; Roberts KC; Woldorff MG
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62802. PubMed ID: 23638149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A PRP-study to determine the locus of target priming effects.
Klapötke S; Krüger D; Mattler U
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):882-900. PubMed ID: 21570320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
Reimer CB; Schubert T
Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
Hsieh S
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Existence of competing modality dominances.
Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance.
Sigman M; Dehaene S
J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 28(30):7585-98. PubMed ID: 18650336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multisensory Competition Is Modulated by Sensory Pathway Interactions with Fronto-Sensorimotor and Default-Mode Network Regions.
Huang S; Li Y; Zhang W; Zhang B; Liu X; Mo L; Chen Q
J Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 35(24):9064-77. PubMed ID: 26085631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?
Van Selst M; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Oct; 25(5):1268-83. PubMed ID: 10531663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
