247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30082684)
1. AND-1 fork protection function prevents fork resection and is essential for proliferation.
Abe T; Kawasumi R; Giannattasio M; Dusi S; Yoshimoto Y; Miyata K; Umemura K; Hirota K; Branzei D
Nat Commun; 2018 Aug; 9(1):3091. PubMed ID: 30082684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ctf4 Prevents Genome Rearrangements by Suppressing DNA Double-Strand Break Formation and Its End Resection at Arrested Replication Forks.
Sasaki M; Kobayashi T
Mol Cell; 2017 May; 66(4):533-545.e5. PubMed ID: 28525744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gap-filling and bypass at the replication fork are both active mechanisms for tolerance of low-dose ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in the human genome.
Quinet A; Vessoni AT; Rocha CR; Gottifredi V; Biard D; Sarasin A; Menck CF; Stary A
DNA Repair (Amst); 2014 Feb; 14():27-38. PubMed ID: 24380689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments.
Kolinjivadi AM; Sannino V; De Antoni A; Zadorozhny K; Kilkenny M; Técher H; Baldi G; Shen R; Ciccia A; Pellegrini L; Krejci L; Costanzo V
Mol Cell; 2017 Sep; 67(5):867-881.e7. PubMed ID: 28757209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deletion of BRCA2 exon 27 causes defects in response to both stalled and collapsed replication forks.
Kim TM; Son MY; Dodds S; Hu L; Hasty P
Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():66-72. PubMed ID: 25847274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deletion of BRCA2 exon 27 causes defects in response to both stalled and collapsed replication forks.
Kim TM; Son MY; Dodds S; Hu L; Hasty P
Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():66-72. PubMed ID: 25773776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MAD2L2 promotes replication fork protection and recovery in a shieldin-independent and REV3L-dependent manner.
Paniagua I; Tayeh Z; Falcone M; Hernández Pérez S; Cerutti A; Jacobs JJL
Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5167. PubMed ID: 36075897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The HIRAN domain of helicase-like transcription factor positions the DNA translocase motor to drive efficient DNA fork regression.
Chavez DA; Greer BH; Eichman BF
J Biol Chem; 2018 Jun; 293(22):8484-8494. PubMed ID: 29643183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unprotected Replication Forks Are Converted into Mitotic Sister Chromatid Bridges.
Ait Saada A; Teixeira-Silva A; Iraqui I; Costes A; Hardy J; Paoletti G; Fréon K; Lambert SAE
Mol Cell; 2017 May; 66(3):398-410.e4. PubMed ID: 28475874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks.
Langerak P; Mejia-Ramirez E; Limbo O; Russell P
PLoS Genet; 2011 Sep; 7(9):e1002271. PubMed ID: 21931565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CtIP-Mediated Fork Protection Synergizes with BRCA1 to Suppress Genomic Instability upon DNA Replication Stress.
Przetocka S; Porro A; Bolck HA; Walker C; Lezaja A; Trenner A; von Aesch C; Himmels SF; D'Andrea AD; Ceccaldi R; Altmeyer M; Sartori AA
Mol Cell; 2018 Nov; 72(3):568-582.e6. PubMed ID: 30344097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EEPD1 Rescues Stressed Replication Forks and Maintains Genome Stability by Promoting End Resection and Homologous Recombination Repair.
Wu Y; Lee SH; Williamson EA; Reinert BL; Cho JH; Xia F; Jaiswal AS; Srinivasan G; Patel B; Brantley A; Zhou D; Shao L; Pathak R; Hauer-Jensen M; Singh S; Kong K; Wu X; Kim HS; Beissbarth T; Gaedcke J; Burma S; Nickoloff JA; Hromas RA
PLoS Genet; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1005675. PubMed ID: 26684013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cdk1 uncouples CtIP-dependent resection and Rad51 filament formation during M-phase double-strand break repair.
Peterson SE; Li Y; Chait BT; Gottesman ME; Baer R; Gautier J
J Cell Biol; 2011 Sep; 194(5):705-20. PubMed ID: 21893598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error-free DNA damage tolerance and sister chromatid proximity during DNA replication rely on the Polα/Primase/Ctf4 Complex.
Fumasoni M; Zwicky K; Vanoli F; Lopes M; Branzei D
Mol Cell; 2015 Mar; 57(5):812-823. PubMed ID: 25661486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11.
Schlacher K; Christ N; Siaud N; Egashira A; Wu H; Jasin M
Cell; 2011 May; 145(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 21565612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human CST complex protects stalled replication forks by directly blocking MRE11 degradation of nascent-strand DNA.
Lyu X; Lei KH; Biak Sang P; Shiva O; Chastain M; Chi P; Chai W
EMBO J; 2021 Jan; 40(2):e103654. PubMed ID: 33210317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replication fork progression during re-replication requires the DNA damage checkpoint and double-strand break repair.
Alexander JL; Barrasa MI; Orr-Weaver TL
Curr Biol; 2015 Jun; 25(12):1654-60. PubMed ID: 26051888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dormant origins and fork protection mechanisms rescue sister forks arrested by transcription.
Brambati A; Zardoni L; Achar YJ; Piccini D; Galanti L; Colosio A; Foiani M; Liberi G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Feb; 46(3):1227-1239. PubMed ID: 29059325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance.
González-Prieto R; Muñoz-Cabello AM; Cabello-Lobato MJ; Prado F
EMBO J; 2013 May; 32(9):1307-21. PubMed ID: 23563117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Replication fork integrity and intra-S phase checkpoint suppress gene amplification.
Kondratova A; Watanabe T; Marotta M; Cannon M; Segall AM; Serre D; Tanaka H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2678-90. PubMed ID: 25672394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
