These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30083584)

  • 1. Faster colonoscope withdrawal time without impaired detection using EndoRings.
    Thygesen JC; Ponugoti P; Tippins WW; Garcia JR; Sullivan AW; Broadley HM; Rex DK
    Endosc Int Open; 2018 Aug; 6(8):E957-E960. PubMed ID: 30083584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Kessler WR; Sagi SV; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Wo JM; Dewitt JM; McHenry L; Lahr RE; Searight MP; MacPhail M; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study.
    Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Rex DK; Repici A; Gross SA; Hassan C; Ponugoti PL; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Thygesen JC; Sullivan AW; Tippins WW; Main SA; Eckert GJ; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):335-344.e2. PubMed ID: 29530353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial.
    Hassan C; Senore C; Manes G; Fuccio L; Iacopini F; Ricciardiello L; Anderloni A; Frazzoni L; Ballanti R; de Nucci G; Colussi D; Redaelli D; Lorenzetti R; Devani M; Arena I; Grossi C; Andrei F; Balestrazzi E; Sharma P; Rex DK; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):583-590.e1. PubMed ID: 30365984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of EndoRings on colon adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 33140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective study of endoscopist-blinded colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates in a tertiary hospital.
    Lim G; Viney SK; Chapman BA; Frizelle FA; Gearry RB
    N Z Med J; 2012 Jun; 125(1356):52-9. PubMed ID: 22729059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-definition colonoscopy with i-Scan: better diagnosis for small polyps and flat adenomas.
    Testoni PA; Notaristefano C; Vailati C; Di Leo M; Viale E
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5231-9. PubMed ID: 23066318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endocuff Vision Reduces Inspection Time Without Decreasing Lesion Detection: A Clinical Randomized Trial.
    Rex DK; Slaven JE; Garcia J; Lahr R; Searight M; Gross SA
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Jan; 18(1):158-162.e1. PubMed ID: 30659990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of adenoma detection by colonoscopy between polypectomy performed during both insertion and withdrawal versus during withdrawal only: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
    Gweon TG; Lee SW; Ji JS; Lee JR; Kim JS; Kim BW; Choi H
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5461-5468. PubMed ID: 31953727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of polyp detection during both insertion and withdrawal versus only withdrawal of colonoscopy: A prospective randomized trial.
    Cheng CL; Kuo YL; Liu NJ; Tang JH; Fan JW; Lin CH; Tsui YN; Lee BP; Hung HL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 30675926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).
    Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies.
    Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.