These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30083592)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of ESD versus EMR in a large European series of non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors.
    Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E; Quénéhervé L; Margos W; Shaza L; Ivekovic H; Moreels TG; Yeung R; Piessevaux H; Coron E; Jouret-Mourin A; Deprez PH
    Endosc Int Open; 2018 Aug; 6(8):E1008-E1014. PubMed ID: 30083592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E; Quénéhervé L; Margos W; Moreels TG; Yeung R; Piessevaux H; Coron E; Jouret-Mourin A; Deprez PH
    Endosc Int Open; 2018 Aug; 6(8):E998-E1007. PubMed ID: 30083591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Non-Ampullary Superficial Duodenal Tumor.
    Hoteya S; Furuhata T; Takahito T; Fukuma Y; Suzuki Y; Kikuchi D; Mitani T; Matsui A; Yamashita S; Nomura K; Kuribayashi Y; Iizuka T; Kaise M
    Digestion; 2017; 95(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28052275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.
    Basford PJ; George R; Nixon E; Chaudhuri T; Mead R; Bhandari P
    Surg Endosc; 2014 May; 28(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 24442676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety of Duodenal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor: A Single-Center Study in the United States.
    Koseki M; Nishimura M; Nammour T; Chin K; Nagao S; Beauvais JC; Schattner MA
    J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38202150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumor.
    Yamamoto Y; Yoshizawa N; Tomida H; Fujisaki J; Igarashi M
    Dig Endosc; 2014 Apr; 26 Suppl 2():50-6. PubMed ID: 24750149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic mucosal resection
    Esaki M; Haraguchi K; Akahoshi K; Tomoeda N; Aso A; Itaba S; Ogino H; Kitagawa Y; Fujii H; Nakamura K; Kubokawa M; Harada N; Minoda Y; Suzuki S; Ihara E; Ogawa Y
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Aug; 12(8):918-930. PubMed ID: 32879668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal lesions.
    Chen D; Fu S; Shen J
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2024 Mar; 48(3):102304. PubMed ID: 38367801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopically treated superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.
    Hara Y; Goda K; Dobashi A; Ohya TR; Kato M; Sumiyama K; Mitsuishi T; Hirooka S; Ikegami M; Tajiri H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(6):707-718. PubMed ID: 30783374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.
    Saito Y; Fukuzawa M; Matsuda T; Fukunaga S; Sakamoto T; Uraoka T; Nakajima T; Ikehara H; Fu KI; Itoi T; Fujii T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19517168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han C; Sun Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 32895709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas.
    Okada K; Tsuchida T; Ishiyama A; Taniguchi T; Suzuki S; Horiuchi Y; Matsuo Y; Yoshizawa N; Suganuma T; Omae M; Kubota M; Hirasawa T; Yamamoto Y; Inamori M; Yamamoto N; Nakajima A; Fujisaki J; Hoshino E; Kawabata K; Igarashi M
    Endoscopy; 2012 Jun; 44(6):556-64. PubMed ID: 22638778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors in East Asian countries: a systematic review.
    Liu J; He Y; Wang Z; Zhang S
    Transl Cancer Res; 2022 May; 11(5):1413-1422. PubMed ID: 35706787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors.
    Kobayashi N; Yoshitake N; Hirahara Y; Konishi J; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Ishikawa T; Sekiguchi R; Fujimori T
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):728-33. PubMed ID: 22004124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.
    De Ceglie A; Hassan C; Mangiavillano B; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Ridola L; Bhandari P; Boeri F; Conio M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 Aug; 104():138-55. PubMed ID: 27370173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for the use of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer in Japan: a comparative study with endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Nakamoto S; Sakai Y; Kasanuki J; Kondo F; Ooka Y; Kato K; Arai M; Suzuki T; Matsumura T; Bekku D; Ito K; Tanaka T; Yokosuka O
    Endoscopy; 2009 Sep; 41(9):746-50. PubMed ID: 19681023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.
    Oka S; Tanaka S; Kaneko I; Mouri R; Hirata M; Kawamura T; Yoshihara M; Chayama K
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 17140890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors.
    Tajika M; Niwa Y; Bhatia V; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Ogura T; Haba S; Yamao K
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1042-9. PubMed ID: 21869682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for type II esophagogastric junction neoplasm.
    Liu Y; He S; Zhang Y; Dou L; Liu X; Yu X; Lu N; Xue L; Wang G
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Feb; 9(4):322. PubMed ID: 33708949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal selection of endoscopic resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection according to lesion size.
    Kawashima K; Abe S; Koga M; Nonaka S; Suzuki H; Yoshinaga S; Oda I; Hikichi T; Ohira H; Saito Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 May; 34(5):. PubMed ID: 32959874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.