152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30084081)
1. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.
Santos-Martins D; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Solis-Vasquez L; Ambrosio FA; Koch A; Forli S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1071-1081. PubMed ID: 31691920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of domain knowledge on blinded predictions of binding energies by alchemical free energy calculations.
Mey ASJS; Jiménez JJ; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 29134431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protein-ligand docking using FFT based sampling: D3R case study.
Padhorny D; Hall DR; Mirzaei H; Mamonov AB; Moghadasi M; Alekseenko A; Beglov D; Kozakov D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):225-230. PubMed ID: 29101520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.
El Khoury L; Santos-Martins D; Sasmal S; Eberhardt J; Bianco G; Ambrosio FA; Solis-Vasquez L; Koch A; Forli S; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1011-1020. PubMed ID: 31691919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MathDL: mathematical deep learning for D3R Grand Challenge 4.
Nguyen DD; Gao K; Wang M; Wei GW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Feb; 34(2):131-147. PubMed ID: 31734815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods.
Sippl W
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2000 Aug; 14(6):559-72. PubMed ID: 10921772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open-ComBind: harnessing unlabeled data for improved binding pose prediction.
McNutt AT; Koes DR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Dec; 38(1):3. PubMed ID: 38062207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Template-guided method for protein-ligand complex structure prediction: Application to CASP15 protein-ligand studies.
Xu X; Duan R; Zou X
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1829-1836. PubMed ID: 37283068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantum Mechanics-Based Fast and Reliable Prediction of Binding Pose Structures.
Al-Ansi AY; Al-Shawesh GH; Ru X; Lin Z
J Phys Chem B; 2024 Jun; 128(25):6059-6070. PubMed ID: 38875526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advancing Ligand Docking through Deep Learning: Challenges and Prospects in Virtual Screening.
Zhang X; Shen C; Zhang H; Kang Y; Hsieh CY; Hou T
Acc Chem Res; 2024 May; 57(10):1500-1509. PubMed ID: 38577892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CB-Dock: a web server for cavity detection-guided protein-ligand blind docking.
Liu Y; Grimm M; Dai WT; Hou MC; Xiao ZX; Cao Y
Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2020 Jan; 41(1):138-144. PubMed ID: 31263275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ALiBERO: evolving a team of complementary pocket conformations rather than a single leader.
Rueda M; Totrov M; Abagyan R
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2705-14. PubMed ID: 22947092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PL-PatchSurfer: a novel molecular local surface-based method for exploring protein-ligand interactions.
Hu B; Zhu X; Monroe L; Bures MG; Kihara D
Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Aug; 15(9):15122-45. PubMed ID: 25167137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational energy range of ligands in protein crystal structures: The difficult quest for accurate understanding.
Peach ML; Cachau RE; Nicklaus MC
J Mol Recognit; 2017 Aug; 30(8):. PubMed ID: 28233410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CoDock-Ligand: combined template-based docking and CNN-based scoring in ligand binding prediction.
Pang M; He W; Lu X; She Y; Xie L; Kong R; Chang S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 24(1):444. PubMed ID: 37996806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binary image representation of a ligand binding site: its application to efficient sampling of a conformational ensemble.
Sung E; Kim S; Shin W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():256. PubMed ID: 20478076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.
Raman EP; Yu W; Guvench O; Mackerell AD
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):877-96. PubMed ID: 21456594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A structure-guided approach for protein pocket modeling and affinity prediction.
Varela R; Cleves AE; Spitzer R; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2013 Nov; 27(11):917-34. PubMed ID: 24214361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
