These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30085055)
1. Assessment of the myocardial area at risk: comparing T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-enhanced cine (CE-SSFP) imaging-a DANAMI3 substudy. Göransson C; Ahtarovski KA; Kyhl K; Lønborg J; Nepper-Christensen L; Bertelsen L; Ghotbi AA; Schoos MM; Køber L; Høfsten D; Helqvist S; Kelbæk H; Engstrøm T; Vejlstrup N Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):361-366. PubMed ID: 30085055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-vendor, multicentre comparison of contrast-enhanced SSFP and T2-STIR CMR for determining myocardium at risk in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Nordlund D; Klug G; Heiberg E; Koul S; Larsen TH; Hoffmann P; Metzler B; Erlinge D; Atar D; Aletras AH; Carlsson M; Engblom H; Arheden H Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 17(7):744-53. PubMed ID: 27002140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury. Hansen ESS; Pedersen SF; Pedersen SB; Bøtker HE; Kim WY Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 30852704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective assessment of at-risk myocardium in reperfused acute myocardial infarction patients using contrast-enhanced balanced steady-state free-precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3T with SPECT validation. Sun Z; Zhang Q; Zhao H; Yan C; Yang HJ; Li D; Li K; Liu Z; Yang Q; Dharmakumar R J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):25. PubMed ID: 33715636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of both the area-at-risk and acute myocardial infarct size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using T1-mapping. Bulluck H; Hammond-Haley M; Fontana M; Knight DS; Sirker A; Herrey AS; Manisty C; Kellman P; Moon JC; Hausenloy DJ J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 28764773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial area at risk and salvage measured by T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance: reproducibility and comparison of two T2-weighted protocols. Lønborg J; Vejlstrup N; Mathiasen AB; Thomsen C; Jensen JS; Engstrøm T J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Sep; 13(1):50. PubMed ID: 21917186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Myocardium at risk in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction comparison of T2-weighted edema imaging with the MR-assessed endocardial surface area and validation against angiographic scoring. Fuernau G; Eitel I; Franke V; Hildebrandt L; Meissner J; de Waha S; Lurz P; Gutberlet M; Desch S; Schuler G; Thiele H JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(9):967-76. PubMed ID: 21920334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extent of Myocardium at Risk for Left Anterior Descending Artery, Right Coronary Artery, and Left Circumflex Artery Occlusion Depicted by Contrast-Enhanced Steady State Free Precession and T2-Weighted Short Tau Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nordlund D; Heiberg E; Carlsson M; Fründ ET; Hoffmann P; Koul S; Atar D; Aletras AH; Erlinge D; Engblom H; Arheden H Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 27412659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of myocardium at risk with cardiovascular MR: comparison of techniques for edema imaging. McAlindon EJ; Pufulete M; Harris JM; Lawton CB; Moon JC; Manghat N; Hamilton MC; Weale PJ; Bucciarelli-Ducci C Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25333474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of smoking with myocardial injury and clinical outcome in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Reinstadler SJ; Eitel C; Fuernau G; de Waha S; Desch S; Mende M; Metzler B; Schuler G; Thiele H; Eitel I Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26976354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Accuracy of 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping and T2-Weighted Dark-Blood Imaging for the Infarct-Related Coronary Artery in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Layland J; Rauhalammi S; Lee MM; Ahmed N; Carberry J; Teng Yue May V; Watkins S; McComb C; Mangion K; McClure JD; Carrick D; O'Donnell A; Sood A; McEntegart M; Oldroyd KG; Radjenovic A; Berry C J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Mar; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 28364045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. Wright J; Adriaenssens T; Dymarkowski S; Desmet W; Bogaert J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 19608131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging delineates the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Berry C; Kellman P; Mancini C; Chen MY; Bandettini WP; Lowrey T; Hsu LY; Aletras AH; Arai AE Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Sep; 3(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 20631034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CMR imaging of edema in myocardial infarction using cine balanced steady-state free precession. Kumar A; Beohar N; Arumana JM; Larose E; Li D; Friedrich MG; Dharmakumar R JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1265-73. PubMed ID: 22172783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic changes in injured myocardium, very early after acute myocardial infarction, quantified using T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Alkhalil M; Borlotti A; De Maria GL; Gaughran L; Langrish J; Lucking A; Ferreira V; Kharbanda RK; Banning AP; Channon KM; Dall'Armellina E; Choudhury RP J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Dec; 20(1):82. PubMed ID: 30567572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between CMR-derived parameters of ischemia/reperfusion injury and the timing of CMR after reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Masci PG; Pavon AG; Muller O; Iglesias JF; Vincenti G; Monney P; Harbaoui B; Eeckhout E; Schwitter J J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Jul; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 30037343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial salvage by CMR correlates with LV remodeling and early ST-segment resolution in acute myocardial infarction. Masci PG; Ganame J; Strata E; Desmet W; Aquaro GD; Dymarkowski S; Valenti V; Janssens S; Lombardi M; Van de Werf F; L'Abbate A; Bogaert J JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 20129530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial oedema following acute myocardial infarction: Is whole heart coverage necessary? Hamshere S; Jones DA; Pellaton C; Longchamp D; Burchell T; Mohiddin S; Moon JC; Kastrup J; Locca D; Petersen SE; Westwood M; Mathur A J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Jan; 18():7. PubMed ID: 26803468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of acute myocardial injury by CMR at multiple time points after acute myocardial infarction. Symons R; Claus P; Marchi A; Dresselaers T; Bogaert J Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 259():43-46. PubMed ID: 29506936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of infarct size and myocardium at risk: evaluation of different techniques and its implications. McAlindon E; Pufulete M; Lawton C; Angelini GD; Bucciarelli-Ducci C Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jul; 16(7):738-46. PubMed ID: 25736308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]