These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30085835)

  • 1. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
    Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Si Y; Liu RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Predict Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With a Gleason Score of 6.
    Wu CJ; Zhang YD; Bao ML; Li H; Wang XN; Liu XS; Shi HB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 28834443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and their machine-learning-based texture analysis for detection and assessment of prostate cancer severity at 3 T.
    Das CJ; Malagi AV; Sharma R; Mehndiratta A; Kumar V; Khan MA; Seth A; Kaushal S; Nayak B; Kumar R; Gupta AK
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Sep; 37(9):e5144. PubMed ID: 38556777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
    Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer.
    Park H; Kim SH; Lee Y; Son JH
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model.
    Jiang Y; Li C; Liu Y; Shi K; Zhang W; Liu M; Chen M
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer.
    Di Trani MG; Nezzo M; Caporale AS; De Feo R; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Manenti G; Capuani S
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
    Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
    Barrett T; McLean M; Priest AN; Lawrence EM; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Patterson I; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Hötker AM; Mazaheri Y; Aras Ö; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Hricak H; Akin O
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 26900904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
    Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
    Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New RESOLVE-Based Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging in MRI-Visible Prostate Cancer: Effect of Reduced b Value on Image Quality and Diagnostic Effectiveness.
    Zhang YD; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Li H; Yan X; Liu XS; Shi HB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Aug; 207(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 27187062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Periferic Prostate Cancer Detection and Stratification.
    Pesapane F; Patella F; Fumarola EM; Panella S; Ierardi AM; Pompili GG; Franceschelli G; Angileri SA; Magenta Biasina A; Carrafiello G
    Med Oncol; 2017 Mar; 34(3):35. PubMed ID: 28144814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
    Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
    Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.