These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30088220)

  • 1. Mapping correlations of psychological and structural connectome properties of the dataset of the human connectome project with the maximum spanning tree method.
    Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2019 Oct; 13(5):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 30088220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to Direct the Edges of the Connectomes: Dynamics of the Consensus Connectomes and the Development of the Connections in the Human Brain.
    Kerepesi C; Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158680. PubMed ID: 27362431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dorsal striatum and the dynamics of the consensus connectomes in the frontal lobe of the human brain.
    Kerepesi C; Varga B; Szalkai B; Grolmusz V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():51-55. PubMed ID: 29496609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution directed human connectomes and the Consensus Connectome Dynamics.
    Szalkai B; Kerepesi C; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215473. PubMed ID: 30990832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graph Theoretical Analysis Reveals: Women's Brains Are Better Connected than Men's.
    Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130045. PubMed ID: 26132764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential.
    Yeh CH; Smith RE; Dhollander T; Calamante F; Connelly A
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():160-171. PubMed ID: 31082471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum spanning tree analysis of the human connectome.
    van Dellen E; Sommer IE; Bohlken MM; Tewarie P; Draaisma L; Zalesky A; Di Biase M; Brown JA; Douw L; Otte WM; Mandl RCW; Stam CJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Jun; 39(6):2455-2471. PubMed ID: 29468769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing advanced graph-theoretical parameters of the connectomes of the lobes of the human brain.
    Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2018 Dec; 12(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 30483363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tensor network factorizations: Relationships between brain structural connectomes and traits.
    Zhang Z; Allen GI; Zhu H; Dunson D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():330-343. PubMed ID: 31029870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Function-specific and Enhanced Brain Structural Connectivity Mapping via Joint Modeling of Diffusion and Functional MRI.
    Chu SH; Parhi KK; Lenglet C
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4741. PubMed ID: 29549287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced structural connectivity within a brain sub-network supporting working memory and engagement processes after cognitive training.
    Román FJ; Iturria-Medina Y; Martínez K; Karama S; Burgaleta M; Evans AC; Jaeggi SM; Colom R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 May; 141():33-43. PubMed ID: 28323202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An extensive assessment of network alignment algorithms for comparison of brain connectomes.
    Milano M; Guzzi PH; Tymofieva O; Xu D; Hess C; Veltri P; Cannataro M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 18(Suppl 6):235. PubMed ID: 28617222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong-Weak Pruning for Brain Network Identification in Connectome-Wide Neuroimaging: Application to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Stage Characterization.
    Serra A; Galdi P; Pesce E; Fratello M; Trojsi F; Tedeschi G; Tagliaferri R; Esposito F
    Int J Neural Syst; 2019 Sep; 29(7):1950007. PubMed ID: 30929575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The braingraph.org database with more than 1000 robust human connectomes in five resolutions.
    Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2021 Oct; 15(5):915-919. PubMed ID: 34603551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a standardized structural-functional group connectome in MNI space.
    Horn A; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):310-322. PubMed ID: 26327244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of negative correlations in brain connectivity.
    Zhan L; Jenkins LM; Wolfson OE; GadElkarim JJ; Nocito K; Thompson PM; Ajilore OA; Chung MK; Leow AD
    J Comp Neurol; 2017 Oct; 525(15):3251-3265. PubMed ID: 28675490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The braingraph.org database of high resolution structural connectomes and the brain graph tools.
    Kerepesi C; Szalkai B; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2017 Oct; 11(5):483-486. PubMed ID: 29067135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good neighbors, bad neighbors: the frequent network neighborhood mapping of the hippocampus enlightens several structural factors of the human intelligence on a 414-subject cohort.
    Fellner M; Varga B; Grolmusz V
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11967. PubMed ID: 32686740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain.
    Horn A; Ostwald D; Reisert M; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 1():142-51. PubMed ID: 24099851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application of a mathematical model linking structural and functional connectomes in severe brain injury.
    Kuceyeski A; Shah S; Dyke JP; Bickel S; Abdelnour F; Schiff ND; Voss HU; Raj A
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 11():635-647. PubMed ID: 27200264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.