972 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30089179)
21. Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Implantation of an EDOF IOL and a Mix-and-Match Approach.
Tarib I; Kasier I; Herbers C; Hagen P; Breyer D; Kaymak H; Klabe K; Lucchesi R; Teisch S; Diakonis VF; Hahn U; Fabian H; Kretz FTA
J Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 35(7):408-416. PubMed ID: 31298720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
Rodov L; Reitblat O; Levy A; Assia EI; Kleinmann G
J Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 35(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 31298723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.
Palomino-Bautista C; Sánchez-Jean R; Carmona-González D; Piñero DP; Molina-Martín A
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):351-359. PubMed ID: 31583551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Binocular function to increase visual outcome in patients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.
Kretz FT; Müller M; Gerl M; Gerl RH; Auffarth GU
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 15():110. PubMed ID: 26292964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens.
Modi S; Lehmann R; Maxwell A; Solomon K; Cionni R; Thompson V; Horn J; Caplan M; Fisher B; Hu JG; Yeu E
Ophthalmology; 2021 Feb; 128(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 33004211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.
Lubiński W; Podborączyńska-Jodko K; Kirkiewicz M; Mularczyk M; Post M
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2553-2562. PubMed ID: 32488596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Mix-and-Match Implanted Bifocal IOLs and Bilateral Implanted Trifocal IOLs After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.
Yesilirmak N; Akova YA; Donmez O
J Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 35(9):559-564. PubMed ID: 31498413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual function after implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens.
Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega Cueto L; Belda-Salmerón L; Montés-Micó R; Fernández-Vega L
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 26(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26797852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Standard Clinical Outcomes With a New Low Addition Trifocal Intraocular Lens.
Fernández J; Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Martínez J; Tauste A; Piñero DP
J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):214-221. PubMed ID: 30984978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual and Refractive Outcomes After Bi-aspheric Trifocal Toric Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation.
Tañá-Sanz P; Tañá-Sanz S; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Ruiz-Santos M; de Toledo CÁ; Tañá-Rivero P
J Refract Surg; 2024 May; 40(6):e407-e419. PubMed ID: 38848051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical outcomes and surgeon assessment after implantation of a new diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens.
Kretz FT; Bastelica A; Carreras H; Ferreira T; Müller M; Gerl M; Gerl R; Saeed M; Schmickler S; Auffarth GU
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 99(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 25249611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform.
Liu X; Xie L; Huang Y
J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):273-280. PubMed ID: 29634843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.
García-Pérez JL; Gros-Otero J; Sánchez-Ramos C; Blázquez V; Contreras I
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28514944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.
Voskresenskaya A; Pozdeyeva N; Pashtaev N; Batkov Y; Treushnicov V; Cherednik V
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 248(9):1299-306. PubMed ID: 20526609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of clinical outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens (AT LISA, Eyecryl SERT trifocal) versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens (Eyhance, Eyecryl SERT EDOF).
Karuppiah P; Varman NVA; Varman A; Balakumar D
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 70(8):2867-2871. PubMed ID: 35918933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial.
Reinhard T; Maier P; Böhringer D; Bertelmann E; Brockmann T; Kiraly L; Salom D; Piovella M; Colonval S; Mendicute J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 259(2):431-442. PubMed ID: 32915276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses.
Gierek-Ciaciura S; Cwalina L; Bednarski L; Mrukwa-Kominek E
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 19763600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visual outcomes of non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A case-control study.
Sabur H; Unsal U
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):262-268. PubMed ID: 36062601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of visual quality and subjective outcomes among 3 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 bifocal intraocular lens.
Martínez de Carneros-Llorente A; Martínez de Carneros A; Martínez de Carneros-Llorente P; Jiménez-Alfaro I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 May; 45(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30853317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses.
Rementería-Capelo LA; García-Pérez JL; Gros-Otero J; Carrillo V; Pérez-Lanzac J; Contreras I
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):163-172. PubMed ID: 32844238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
